Maile and Another v Premier of Limpopo and Others (1743/2018) [2020] ZALMPPHC 54 (25 June 2020)
The Premier of Limpopo was statutorily obliged under section 3(4) of the Limpopo Act to make a decision on the application for recognition of the Balepye community as a traditional community within three months of receipt. The Premier failed to comply with this duty, and the delay was not justified by the outcome of the Kgatle commission or any procedural requirement regarding recognition of the traditional leader. The applicants demonstrated a clear right to relief under PAJA for failure to take a decision. The interlocutory application by the respondents to declare the applicants vexatious litigants and for costs was misconceived, as the applicants did not persistently institute...
- Citation
- [2020] ZALMPPHC 54
- Parties
- Applicant: Mmankwana Aniekie Maile; Applicant: Balepye Royal Family; Respondent: Premier of Limpopo; Respondent: MEC-Department of Co-operative Governance, Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs, Limpopo; Respondent: Ba-Phalaborwa Local Municipality
- Court
- Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2020
- Case Number
- 1743/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment After Hearing of Main and Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Application for mandamus granted; interlocutory application dismissed.
- Judges
- GC Muller
- Legal Topics
- Mandamus, Failure to Take Decision, Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Traditional Leadership Recognition, Vexatious Litigation, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mmankwana Aniekie Maile
Applicant
Balepye Royal Family
Applicant
Premier of Limpopo
Respondent
MEC-Department of Co-operative Governance, Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs, Limpopo
Respondent
Ba-Phalaborwa Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment After Hearing of Main and Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Premier of Limpopo failed to take a decision on the application for recognition of the Balepye community as a traditional community within the statutory period.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to a mandamus compelling the Premier to make a decision under section 3(4) of the Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act.
- 3 Whether the respondents' interlocutory application to declare the applicants vexatious litigants and for costs is justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The Premier of Limpopo was statutorily obliged under section 3(4) of the Limpopo Act to make a decision on the application for recognition of the Balepye community as a traditional community within three months of receipt. The Premier failed to comply with this duty, and the delay was not justified by the outcome of the Kgatle commission or any procedural requirement regarding recognition of the traditional leader. The applicants demonstrated a clear right to relief under PAJA for failure to take a decision. The interlocutory application by the respondents to declare the applicants vexatious litigants and for costs was misconceived, as the applicants did not persistently institute...
Court Disposition
Application for mandamus granted; interlocutory application dismissed.
Orders
- The Premier of Limpopo is ordered to make a decision as envisaged by section 3(4) of the Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act, Act 6 of 2005, in respect of the application for recognition by the Balepye community dated 16 June 2017, within one month from the date of service of this order on the State...
- Each party is to pay its own costs in respect of the main application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment