Maimela v Maimela and Others (13282/16) [2017] ZAGPJHC 366 (24 August 2017)
The court found that the property was registered in the names of the first and second respondents without the required enquiry as mandated by the Conversion Act and the Gauteng Housing Act. The deceased had applied for ownership but died before the process was completed, and no lawful determination of beneficiaries was made. The first respondent did not apply for the title deed and was unaware of its registration. The court held that the transfer was unlawful and must be set aside. An enquiry must be conducted to determine the lawful beneficiaries, and the title deed must be cancelled with ownership reverting to the Gauteng Provincial Department of Housing pending the outcome of the...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAGPJHC 366
- Parties
- Applicant: Mokgadi Angelina Maimela; Respondent: Richard Maimela; Respondent: Raisibe Betty Maimela; Respondent: Director-General, Human Settlements Department, Gauteng Province; Respondent: MEC of Human Settlements Department, Gauteng Province; Respondent: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2017
- Case Number
- 13282/16
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. Title deed cancelled. Enquiry ordered to determine lawful beneficiaries. Costs awarded to applicant.
- Judges
- R Francis
- Legal Topics
- Conversion of Rights to Ownership, Succession Disputes, Housing Disputes, Title Deed Cancellation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mokgadi Angelina Maimela
Applicant
Richard Maimela
Respondent
Raisibe Betty Maimela
Respondent
Director-General, Human Settlements Department, Gauteng Province
Respondent
MEC of Human Settlements Department, Gauteng Province
Respondent
City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the registration of the property into the names of the first and second respondents was lawful.
- 2 Whether the process required by the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act 81 of 1988 was followed.
- 3 Whether an enquiry should be conducted to determine the lawful beneficiaries of the property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the property was registered in the names of the first and second respondents without the required enquiry as mandated by the Conversion Act and the Gauteng Housing Act. The deceased had applied for ownership but died before the process was completed, and no lawful determination of beneficiaries was made. The first respondent did not apply for the title deed and was unaware of its registration. The court held that the transfer was unlawful and must be set aside. An enquiry must be conducted to determine the lawful beneficiaries, and the title deed must be cancelled with ownership reverting to the Gauteng Provincial Department of Housing pending the outcome of the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Title deed cancelled. Enquiry ordered to determine lawful beneficiaries. Costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- Title Deed No: T 70021/1998 for ERF [...] Meadowlands Township, Soweto, Gauteng, currently in the names of Richard Maimela and Raisibe Betty Maimela, is cancelled.
- The Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg, is ordered to cancel Title Deed No: T 70021/1998 for ERF [...], Meadowlands Township, Soweto, Gauteng.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment