Main Street 1438 (Pty) Ltd v Little Green Beverages (Pty) Ltd (LM168Nov16) [2017] ZACT 7 (19 January 2017)

Main Street 1438 (Pty) Ltd v Little Green Beverages (Pty) Ltd (LM168Nov16) [2017] ZACT 7 (19 January 2017)

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in any horizontal overlap, as the merging parties do not compete in any relevant market in South Africa. The only vertical overlap identified was between Neopak, a subsidiary of the acquiring firm, and LGB, regarding the supply of corrugated packaging. However, procurement from Neopak would remain on an arm's length basis, and LGB would continue to source from existing suppliers based on price and quality. The Commission concluded that the merger is unlikely to result in input or customer foreclosure. Furthermore, the transaction raises no public interest concerns, including no negative effect on employment. Therefore, the...

Citation
[2017] ZACT 7
Parties
Applicant: Main Street 1438 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Little Green Beverages (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 January 2017
Case Number
LM168Nov16
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Reasons for Decision
Outcome
Merger approved without conditions.
Judges
Yasmin Carrim, Norman Manoim, Andreas Wessels
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Vertical Overlap, Input Foreclosure, Public Interest, Employment Effects
Competition Law Merger Control Vertical Overlap Input Foreclosure Public Interest Employment Effects

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Main Street 1438 (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Little Green Beverages (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Approval / Reasons for Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger between Main Street 1438 (Pty) Ltd and Little Green Beverages (Pty) Ltd is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including effects on employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in any horizontal overlap, as the merging parties do not compete in any relevant market in South Africa. The only vertical overlap identified was between Neopak, a subsidiary of the acquiring firm, and LGB, regarding the supply of corrugated packaging. However, procurement from Neopak would remain on an arm's length basis, and LGB would continue to source from existing suppliers based on price and quality. The Commission concluded that the merger is unlikely to result in input or customer foreclosure. Furthermore, the transaction raises no public interest concerns, including no negative effect on employment. Therefore, the...

Court Disposition

Merger approved without conditions.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction between Main Street 1438 (Pty) Ltd and Little Green Beverages (Pty) Ltd is approved unconditionally.