Main Street 1511 (Pty) Ltd v Roossenkal Foods Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM265Jan18) [2018] ZACT 18 (5 March 2018)
The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging parties, as the Abraaj Group does not have interests in any KFC or other fast food retail operations in South Africa. The proposed transaction is therefore unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that the transaction would not result in any retrenchments or job losses, and no other public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal agreed with the Competition Commission's assessment and approved the merger unconditionally.
- Citation
- [2018] ZACT 18
- Parties
- Applicant: Main Street 1511 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Roossenekal Foods Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 March 2018
- Case Number
- LM265Jan18
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Final Determination
- Outcome
- The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Andreas Wessels, Mondo Mazwai, Andiswa Ndoni
- Legal Topics
- Merger Notification, Substantial Lessening of Competition, Public Interest, Sale of Shares
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Main Street 1511 (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Roossenekal Foods Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the merger raises any public interest concerns, including retrenchments or job losses.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging parties, as the Abraaj Group does not have interests in any KFC or other fast food retail operations in South Africa. The proposed transaction is therefore unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that the transaction would not result in any retrenchments or job losses, and no other public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal agreed with the Competition Commission's assessment and approved the merger unconditionally.
Court Disposition
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment