Majiedt N.O and Another v Prinsloo (641/2021) [2023] ZAFSHC 201 (19 May 2023)

Majiedt N.O and Another v Prinsloo (641/2021) [2023] ZAFSHC 201 (19 May 2023)

Section 63 of the Long-Term Insurance Act, 52 of 1998, does not protect the proceeds of a life insurance policy paid directly to a nominated beneficiary who is not the policyholder. The statutory protection applies only where the policyholder is also the beneficiary. In this case, the deceased as policyholder appointed Nelly as beneficiary, and she accepted the benefit upon his death. The proceeds were paid directly to her and did not form part of the deceased's estate. Therefore, section 63 is not applicable, and the benefits received by Nelly are not protected from the claims of creditors of the insolvent joint estate. The plaintiffs' claim must be determined under the Insolvency Act...

Citation
[2023] ZAFSHC 201
Parties
Plaintiff: Donovan Theodore Majiedt N.O.; Plaintiff: Reinette Steynsburg N.O.; Defendant: Eugene Prinsloo
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 May 2023
Case Number
641/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Separation of Issues Under Rule 33 4
Outcome
The benefits of the long-term life insurance policy received by Nelly Arlene Prinsloo are not protected under section 63 of the Long-Term Insurance Act, 52 of 1998.
Judges
Van Zyl
Legal Topics
Long Term Insurance Act, Separation of Issues, Insolvent Estate, Beneficiary Nomination, Statutory Interpretation
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure Long Term Insurance Act Separation of Issues Insolvent Estate Beneficiary Nomination Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donovan Theodore Majiedt N.O.

Plaintiff

Reinette Steynsburg N.O.

Plaintiff

Eugene Prinsloo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Separation of Issues Under Rule 33 4

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proceeds of a long-term life insurance policy received by a nominated beneficiary are protected from creditors under section 63 of the Long-Term Insurance Act, 52 of 1998.
  2. 2 Whether section 63 protection applies when the beneficiary is not the policyholder but a third party.
  3. 3 Whether the policy benefits form part of the insolvent estate of the deceased or the beneficiary.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 63 of the Long-Term Insurance Act, 52 of 1998, does not protect the proceeds of a life insurance policy paid directly to a nominated beneficiary who is not the policyholder. The statutory protection applies only where the policyholder is also the beneficiary. In this case, the deceased as policyholder appointed Nelly as beneficiary, and she accepted the benefit upon his death. The proceeds were paid directly to her and did not form part of the deceased's estate. Therefore, section 63 is not applicable, and the benefits received by Nelly are not protected from the claims of creditors of the insolvent joint estate. The plaintiffs' claim must be determined under the Insolvency Act...

Court Disposition

The benefits of the long-term life insurance policy received by Nelly Arlene Prinsloo are not protected under section 63 of the Long-Term Insurance Act, 52 of 1998.

Orders

  • The benefits of the long-term life insurance policy received by Nelly Arlene Prinsloo are not protected in terms of section 63 of the Long-Term Insurance Act, 52 of 1998.
  • The costs in respect of the determination of the separated issue stand over for later adjudication.