Makgotho and Another v S (A251/2017) [2018] ZAGPJHC 520 (7 September 2018)

Makgotho and Another v S (A251/2017) [2018] ZAGPJHC 520 (7 September 2018)

The appeal court found that the trial magistrate exercised the necessary caution in evaluating the evidence of the single witness, and that the complainant's account was corroborated by medical evidence and her sister's testimony. The appellants' version was not reasonably possibly true and was correctly rejected. No material misdirection was found in the trial court's factual or legal findings. Regarding sentence, the court held that the trial magistrate properly considered the aggravating factors, including the serious and lasting injuries inflicted on the complainant, and applied the correct sentencing principles. The sentence imposed did not induce a sense of shock and was not...

Citation
[2018] ZAGPJHC 520
Parties
Appellant: Maleya Makgotho; Appellant: Abel Makhura; Respondent: The State
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
7 September 2018
Case Number
A251/2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From Regional Magistrate's Court
Outcome
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Judges
M B Mahalelo, U Bhoola
Legal Topics
Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Kidnapping, Single Witness Evidence, Sentencing Principles, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm Kidnapping Single Witness Evidence Sentencing Principles Appeal Against Conviction Appeal Against Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maleya Makgotho

Appellant

Abel Makhura

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From Regional Magistrate's Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial court misdirected itself in finding the appellants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence of the single witness was sufficiently reliable to sustain a conviction.
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was disproportionate to the circumstances and warranted interference on appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal court found that the trial magistrate exercised the necessary caution in evaluating the evidence of the single witness, and that the complainant's account was corroborated by medical evidence and her sister's testimony. The appellants' version was not reasonably possibly true and was correctly rejected. No material misdirection was found in the trial court's factual or legal findings. Regarding sentence, the court held that the trial magistrate properly considered the aggravating factors, including the serious and lasting injuries inflicted on the complainant, and applied the correct sentencing principles. The sentence imposed did not induce a sense of shock and was not...

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal against conviction and sentence by both appellants is dismissed.