Makhanya v Minister of Water Affairs and Sanitation and Others (1578/2016P; 3861/2016P) [2016] ZAKZPHC 110 (8 December 2016)

Makhanya v Minister of Water Affairs and Sanitation and Others (1578/2016P; 3861/2016P) [2016] ZAKZPHC 110 (8 December 2016)

The court found that the order delivered on 28 November 2016 was ambiguous and required correction under Rule 42(1)(b) of the Uniform Rules of Court. The extension of the board members' terms of office by the first respondent was declared invalid, as was the decision by the board members to pursue disciplinary...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] ZAKZPHC 110
Parties
Applicant: Atwell Sibusiso Makhanya; Respondent: The Minister of Water Affairs and Sanitation; Respondent: Duduzile Myeni N.O.; Respondent: Musa Xulu N.O.; Respondent: Poppy Dlamini N.O.; Respondent: Frederick Bosman N.O.; Respondent: Nonhlanhla Khumalo N.O.; Respondent: Amit Badul N.O.; Respondent: Brian Rawlins N.O.; Respondent: Nica Gevers N.O.; Respondent: Thembinkosi Madikane N.O.; Respondent: Bongi Mshengu N.O.; Respondent: Simo Chamane N.O.; Respondent: Mhlatuze Water
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
1578/2016P; 3861/2016P
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Correction of Order Under Rule 42(1)(b) Following Judgment Delivered on 28 November 2016
Outcome
Order corrected under Rule 42(1)(b); previous decisions declared invalid and set aside; costs awarded to applicant.
Judges
Mbatha
Legal Topics
Review of Administrative Action, Setting Aside Invalid Decisions, Rule 42 Correction of Orders, Disciplinary Proceedings, Board Appointments
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Review of Administrative Action Setting Aside Invalid Decisions Rule 42 Correction of Orders Disciplinary Proceedings Board Appointments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Atwell Sibusiso Makhanya

Applicant

The Minister of Water Affairs and Sanitation

Respondent

Duduzile Myeni N.O.

Respondent

Musa Xulu N.O.

Respondent

Poppy Dlamini N.O.

Respondent

Frederick Bosman N.O.

Respondent

Nonhlanhla Khumalo N.O.

Respondent

Amit Badul N.O.

Respondent

Brian Rawlins N.O.

Respondent

Nica Gevers N.O.

Respondent

Thembinkosi Madikane N.O.

Respondent

Bongi Mshengu N.O.

Respondent

Simo Chamane N.O.

Respondent

Mhlatuze Water

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Correction of Order Under Rule 42(1)(b) Following Judgment Delivered on 28 November 2016

  1. 1 Whether the extension of the board members' terms of office by the first respondent was valid.
  2. 2 Whether the disciplinary proceedings and suspension of the applicant by the board members were lawful.
  3. 3 Whether the previous order required correction due to ambiguity under Rule 42(1)(b).

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the order delivered on 28 November 2016 was ambiguous and required correction under Rule 42(1)(b) of the Uniform Rules of Court. The extension of the board members' terms of office by the first respondent was declared invalid, as was the decision by the board members to pursue disciplinary proceedings and suspend the applicant. The court suspended the operation of these orders for 180 days to allow the first respondent to appoint a new board. The disciplinary proceedings against the applicant were to be conducted by an independent firm and finalized by a specified date, with recommendations to be considered by the newly appointed board. The applicant was awarded costs...

Court Disposition

Order corrected under Rule 42(1)(b); previous decisions declared invalid and set aside; costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • The decision by the first respondent to extend the terms of office of the board members of the thirteenth respondent is declared invalid and set aside.
  • The decision by the second to twelfth respondents to pursue disciplinary proceedings against the applicant and suspend him is declared invalid and set aside.