Makhubo and Another v Maluleke and Others (22297/2011) [2012] ZAGPJHC 206 (10 October 2012)
The court found that the transfer of the property from the Province of Gauteng to Sipho Michael Motha and all subsequent transfers were tainted by fraud, irregularities, and improper conduct by officials and transferees. The applicants demonstrated continuous occupation and persistent efforts to challenge the transfers. The processes used to effect transfer were fatally flawed and did not comply with the applicable legislation. The court held that the Registrar of Deeds must cancel the title deed and revert ownership to the Gauteng Provincial Government. An enquiry in terms of section 2 of the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act 81 of 1988 must be conducted to...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAGPJHC 206
- Parties
- Applicant: Lindiwe Nyandeni Makhubo; Applicant: Kenneth Mahlokohla; Respondent: Gift Maluleke; Respondent: The Standard Bank of SA Ltd; Respondent: Director-General: Gauteng Province; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg; Respondent: Sarah Phethelaphi Shipalane
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2012
- Case Number
- 22297/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The transfer of the property and all subsequent transfers are set aside and declared null and void. Ownership reverts to the Gauteng Provincial Government. An enquiry is ordered to determine the rightful owner. Costs awarded against the second respondent.
- Judges
- N F Kgomo
- Legal Topics
- Conversion of Rights to Ownership, Fraudulent Transfer, Deeds Registry Act, Section 2 Enquiry, Setting Aside Transfer, Locus Standi
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lindiwe Nyandeni Makhubo
Applicant
Kenneth Mahlokohla
Applicant
Gift Maluleke
Respondent
The Standard Bank of SA Ltd
Respondent
Director-General: Gauteng Province
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
Respondent
Sarah Phethelaphi Shipalane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of Erf 1428, Key Drive, Jabulani, Soweto from the Province of Gauteng to Sipho Michael Motha and subsequent transfers were lawful.
- 2 Whether the applicants have locus standi to challenge the transfers and seek ownership.
- 3 Whether the Registrar of Deeds should cancel the title deed and revert ownership to the Gauteng Provincial Government.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the transfer of the property from the Province of Gauteng to Sipho Michael Motha and all subsequent transfers were tainted by fraud, irregularities, and improper conduct by officials and transferees. The applicants demonstrated continuous occupation and persistent efforts to challenge the transfers. The processes used to effect transfer were fatally flawed and did not comply with the applicable legislation. The court held that the Registrar of Deeds must cancel the title deed and revert ownership to the Gauteng Provincial Government. An enquiry in terms of section 2 of the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act 81 of 1988 must be conducted to...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The transfer of the property and all subsequent transfers are set aside and declared null and void. Ownership reverts to the Gauteng Provincial Government. An enquiry is ordered to determine the rightful owner. Costs awarded against the second respondent.
Orders
- The transfer of Erf 1428, Key Drive, Johannesburg, Soweto from the Province of Gauteng to Sipho Michael Motha and all subsequent transfers is set aside and declared null and void and cancelled.
- The Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg is ordered to cancel the title deed or Deed of Transfer T11950/1999 involving Sipho Michael Motha and revert ownership of the property to the Gauteng Provincial Government.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment