Makukau v Ramotshere Moiloa Local Municipality and Another (J633/16) [2016] ZALCJHB 486 (21 June 2016)
The Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to declare municipal council meetings and appointments unlawful under the Municipal Systems Act, as such matters fall outside its statutory competence. However, the court has jurisdiction to enforce compliance with the applicant's contract of employment under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, insofar as the disciplinary regulations form part of that contract. The applicant's suspension has lapsed under regulation 6 of the Local Government: Disciplinary Regulations for Senior Managers, entitling him to return to work. The remaining issues regarding compliance with disciplinary regulations are postponed for further determination. The court admits...
- Citation
- [2016] ZALCJHB 486
- Parties
- Applicant: George Makukau; Respondent: Ramotshere Moiloa Local Municipality; Respondent: Thompson Phakalane
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2016
- Case Number
- J633/16
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Ruling on Preliminary Points and Jurisdiction; Partial Declaratory Relief Granted; Matter Postponed for Determination of Compliance With Disciplinary Regulations.
- Outcome
- Applicant's suspension declared lapsed; applicant entitled to return to work; application postponed for determination of compliance with disciplinary regulations; costs reserved.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Disciplinary Regulations for Senior Managers, Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Suspension of Senior Manager, Municipal Systems Act Compliance, Declaratory Relief, Interdict Against Disciplinary Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Makukau
Applicant
Ramotshere Moiloa Local Municipality
Respondent
Thompson Phakalane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Ruling on Preliminary Points and Jurisdiction; Partial Declaratory Relief Granted; Matter Postponed for Determination of Compliance With Disciplinary Regulations.
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Labour Court have jurisdiction to declare municipal council meetings and appointments unlawful under the Municipal Systems Act?
- 2 Has the applicant's suspension lapsed under regulation 6 of the Local Government: Disciplinary Regulations for Senior Managers?
- 3 Has the first respondent complied with the disciplinary regulations in initiating proceedings against the applicant?
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to declare municipal council meetings and appointments unlawful under the Municipal Systems Act, as such matters fall outside its statutory competence. However, the court has jurisdiction to enforce compliance with the applicant's contract of employment under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, insofar as the disciplinary regulations form part of that contract. The applicant's suspension has lapsed under regulation 6 of the Local Government: Disciplinary Regulations for Senior Managers, entitling him to return to work. The remaining issues regarding compliance with disciplinary regulations are postponed for further determination. The court admits...
Court Disposition
Applicant's suspension declared lapsed; applicant entitled to return to work; application postponed for determination of compliance with disciplinary regulations; costs reserved.
Orders
- The applicant's suspension is declared to have lapsed in terms of regulation 6 of the disciplinary regulations for senior managers.
- The applicant is entitled to return to work with immediate effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment