Makwakwa and Another v Mohlamme Funeral Services CC and Others (17716/14) [2015] ZAGPPHC 868 (18 December 2015)
The applicants proved ownership of Erf 4307 by producing a valid title deed. The respondents failed to establish any registered right to occupy or sublet the property, and the alleged subdivision and consolidation were never registered. The defence of lis pendens was dismissed as the pending review application did not involve the same parties or cause of action. The lease agreement between the respondents was unlawful under the PIE Act, as it was concluded without the owner's consent. The occupation by the respondents was therefore unlawful, and the applicants are entitled to eviction and demolition of structures, with compensation for such structures. Costs follow the result.
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 868
- Parties
- Applicant: Solomon Makwakwa; Applicant: Mmapeu Margaret Makwakwa; Respondent: Mohlamme Funeral Services CC; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Rirhandzu Bottle Store (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Omar Igshan N.O.; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Pretoria; Respondent: First National Bank Limited; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria; Respondent: Lena Mmantsweng Ngwenyama; Respondent: Thomas Ngwenyama
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2015
- Case Number
- 17716/14
- Procedural Posture
- Eviction Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for eviction granted with costs.
- Judges
- S Madiba
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Rei Vindicatio, Unlawful Occupation, Lis Pendens, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solomon Makwakwa
Applicant
Mmapeu Margaret Makwakwa
Applicant
Mohlamme Funeral Services CC
Respondent
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Rirhandzu Bottle Store (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Omar Igshan N.O.
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Pretoria
Respondent
First National Bank Limited
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria
Respondent
Lena Mmantsweng Ngwenyama
Respondent
Thomas Ngwenyama
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Eviction Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, as title holders, are entitled to evict the 1st, 8th, and 9th respondents from portion 1 of Erf 4307.
- 2 Whether the defence of lis pendens raised by the respondents is sustainable.
- 3 Whether the lease agreement between the respondents is lawful and enforceable.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants proved ownership of Erf 4307 by producing a valid title deed. The respondents failed to establish any registered right to occupy or sublet the property, and the alleged subdivision and consolidation were never registered. The defence of lis pendens was dismissed as the pending review application did not involve the same parties or cause of action. The lease agreement between the respondents was unlawful under the PIE Act, as it was concluded without the owner's consent. The occupation by the respondents was therefore unlawful, and the applicants are entitled to eviction and demolition of structures, with compensation for such structures. Costs follow the result.
Court Disposition
Application for eviction granted with costs.
Orders
- The 1st, 8th, and 9th respondents and all persons occupying Erf 4307 Saulsville Township are evicted from the premises.
- The 1st, 8th, and 9th respondents and all persons occupying portion 1 of Erf 4307 must vacate the property by 18 January 2016. Applicants are authorized to demolish the wall fence, three carports, and any other structures erected thereon.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment