Malamlela v South African Local Government Bargaining Council (PA4/2017) [2018] ZALAC 25; (2018) 39 ILJ 2454 (LAC) (6 June 2018)
The Labour Appeal Court found that the Labour Court erred by substituting its own decision for that of the arbitrator, failing to act as a review court. The evidence before the arbitrator showed a breakdown in the employment relationship, persistent and deliberate insubordination by the employee, and a reasonable operational decision by the employer to transfer her. The arbitrator's award was reasonable and fell within the bounds required by section 145 of the Labour Relations Act. The employee's refusal to comply with a lawful and reasonable instruction constituted gross insubordination, justifying dismissal. The Labour Court's order was set aside and substituted with an order dismissing...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALAC 25
- Parties
- Appellant: Odwa Malamlela; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Adv Nyameko Gqamana N.O.; Respondent: Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2018
- Case Number
- PA4/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal upheld; Labour Court's order set aside and substituted with dismissal of the review application.
- Judges
- Waglay, Phatshoane, Savage
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Insubordination, Arbitration Review, Retrospective Reinstatement, Municipal Employment, Reasonableness Standard
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Odwa Malamlela
Appellant
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Adv Nyameko Gqamana N.O.
Respondent
Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court erred in setting aside the arbitration award and finding the dismissal substantively unfair.
- 2 Whether the employee was entitled to retrospective reinstatement from the date of dismissal.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator's award fell within the bounds of reasonableness required under section 145 of the Labour Relations Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court found that the Labour Court erred by substituting its own decision for that of the arbitrator, failing to act as a review court. The evidence before the arbitrator showed a breakdown in the employment relationship, persistent and deliberate insubordination by the employee, and a reasonable operational decision by the employer to transfer her. The arbitrator's award was reasonable and fell within the bounds required by section 145 of the Labour Relations Act. The employee's refusal to comply with a lawful and reasonable instruction constituted gross insubordination, justifying dismissal. The Labour Court's order was set aside and substituted with an order dismissing...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal upheld; Labour Court's order set aside and substituted with dismissal of the review application.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The cross-appeal succeeds.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment