Maleka v Health Professions Council of SA (ECJ 2004/051) [2004] ZAECHC 38; [2005] 4 All SA 72 (EC) (28 October 2004)
The court held that the removal of the applicant's registration as an independent general practitioner by the Health Professions Council was administrative action within the meaning of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The registrar's unilateral decision, made without notice or a hearing, was procedurally unfair and contrary to statutory requirements. The court found that the applicant had a legitimate expectation to be notified and heard before any adverse action was taken. Furthermore, the High Court had jurisdiction to review the decision, as provided by the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, regardless of previous common law limitations. The application for review was...
- Citation
- [2004] ZAECHC 38
- Parties
- Applicant: Francis Maleka; Respondent: Health Professions Council of South Africa; Respondent: Member of Executive Council for Health for the Department of Health of the Eastern Cape Province
- Court
- High Courts - Eastern Cape
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2004
- Case Number
- ECJ 2004/051
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judicial Review of Administrative Action; Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for review granted; cancellation of applicant's registration set aside; costs awarded to applicant.
- Judges
- Jones
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Jurisdiction of High Court, Unfair Administrative Action, Legitimate Expectation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Maleka
Applicant
Health Professions Council of South Africa
Respondent
Member of Executive Council for Health for the Department of Health of the Eastern Cape Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judicial Review of Administrative Action; Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the correction of an entry in the medical practitioners register by the Health Professions Council constitutes administrative action under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act.
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review the decision to remove the applicant's registration as an independent general practitioner.
- 3 Whether the applicant was entitled to notice and a hearing before the cancellation of his registration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the removal of the applicant's registration as an independent general practitioner by the Health Professions Council was administrative action within the meaning of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The registrar's unilateral decision, made without notice or a hearing, was procedurally unfair and contrary to statutory requirements. The court found that the applicant had a legitimate expectation to be notified and heard before any adverse action was taken. Furthermore, the High Court had jurisdiction to review the decision, as provided by the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, regardless of previous common law limitations. The application for review was...
Court Disposition
Application for review granted; cancellation of applicant's registration set aside; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- The decision of the first respondent of 15 November 2002 cancelling the applicant's registration as an independent general practitioner is reviewed and set aside.
- The first respondent is ordered to pay the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment