Malewa Communal Property Association and Others v Khombindlela Trading 1 CC (7392/13) [2014] ZAGPPHC 45 (28 February 2014)
The court found that the respondent was not in breach of the lease agreement as he had paid all arrears and deposited the disputed interest into his attorney's trust account, pending a breakdown and certificate of interest which the applicants failed to provide. The applicants did not follow the proper procedure for cancellation as required by the lease agreement, and the initial cancellation letter was based on reasons unrelated to breach. The court further held that the lease agreement was entered into in good faith and did not contravene Section 11(7) of the Restitution of Land Rights Act. Accordingly, there were no grounds to terminate the lease or evict the respondent.
- Citation
- [2014] ZAGPPHC 45
- Parties
- Applicant: Malewa Communal Property Association; Applicant: Minister of Rural Development & Land Reform; Applicant: Commission on Restitution of Land Rights; Respondent: Khombindlela Trading 1 CC
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2014
- Case Number
- 7392/13
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Cancellation of Lease and Eviction
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; costs awarded against the applicants.
- Judges
- M F Kganyago
- Legal Topics
- Lease Agreement Cancellation, Eviction, Breach of Contract, Restitution of Land Rights Act, Notice and Condonation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Malewa Communal Property Association
Applicant
Minister of Rural Development & Land Reform
Applicant
Commission on Restitution of Land Rights
Applicant
Khombindlela Trading 1 CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Cancellation of Lease and Eviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent breached the lease agreement entitling the applicants to cancel the lease and evict the respondent.
- 2 Whether the applicants complied with the procedural requirements for cancellation under the lease agreement.
- 3 Whether the lease agreement was concluded contrary to Section 11(7) of the Restitution of Land Rights Act and thus invalid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent was not in breach of the lease agreement as he had paid all arrears and deposited the disputed interest into his attorney's trust account, pending a breakdown and certificate of interest which the applicants failed to provide. The applicants did not follow the proper procedure for cancellation as required by the lease agreement, and the initial cancellation letter was based on reasons unrelated to breach. The court further held that the lease agreement was entered into in good faith and did not contravene Section 11(7) of the Restitution of Land Rights Act. Accordingly, there were no grounds to terminate the lease or evict the respondent.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; costs awarded against the applicants.
Orders
- The applicants' application is dismissed.
- The applicants are ordered to pay the costs of the respondent jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment