Maluleke v Greater Giyani Local Municipality and Others (J3093/18) [2018] ZALCJHB 456; (2019) 40 ILJ 1061 (LC) (4 October 2018)
The Court found that the applicant failed to establish urgency, as any urgency was self-created and the disciplinary process was ongoing. The defence of lis alibi pendens was dismissed because the High Court application had been withdrawn. The applicant's argument that the Municipal Manager lacked authority to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 456
- Parties
- Applicant: Risimati Hitler Maluleke; Respondent: Greater Giyani Local Municipality; Respondent: The Speaker, Greater Giyani Municipality; Respondent: The Chief-Whip, Greater Giyani Municipality; Respondent: The Mayor, Greater Giyani Municipality; Respondent: The Municipal Manager, Greater Giyani Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 October 2018
- Case Number
- J3093/18
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interdict and Declaratory Relief Prior to Completion of Disciplinary Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Mahosi
- Legal Topics
- Disciplinary Proceedings, Lis Alibi Pendens, Waiver of Rights, Urgent Interdict, Municipal Regulations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Risimati Hitler Maluleke
Applicant
Greater Giyani Local Municipality
Respondent
The Speaker, Greater Giyani Municipality
Respondent
The Chief-Whip, Greater Giyani Municipality
Respondent
The Mayor, Greater Giyani Municipality
Respondent
The Municipal Manager, Greater Giyani Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interdict and Declaratory Relief Prior to Completion of Disciplinary Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disciplinary charges against the applicant relating to his previous employment period are lawful and valid.
- 2 Whether the Municipal Manager had authority to charge the applicant for misconduct committed while acting as Municipal Manager.
- 3 Whether the forensic investigation report is unlawful due to non-compliance with statutory timeframes.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant failed to establish urgency, as any urgency was self-created and the disciplinary process was ongoing. The defence of lis alibi pendens was dismissed because the High Court application had been withdrawn. The applicant's argument that the Municipal Manager lacked authority to charge him was rejected, as he remained employed as CFO and his acting stint as Municipal Manager did not alter his status. The Municipality did not waive its right to discipline the applicant, as it was unaware of the alleged misconduct during the first contract. Although there was a delay in appointing the investigator, the Court held that substantial compliance with the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment