Mampane N.O and Others v National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers ("NUPSAW") and Another (JA51/2018) [2019] ZALAC 64; [2020] 2 BLLR 115 (LAC) ; (2020) 41 ILJ 363 (LAC) (16 October 2019)
The Labour Appeal Court held that the evidence did not establish any right for the employee to an internal appeal against the relocation decision under the policy or otherwise. Even if such a right existed, the Commissioner personally reconsidered the appeal. Furthermore, the Commissioner had statutory authority under section 2D of the Lotteries Act to delegate powers to the Human Capital Manager, and clause 9 of the policy imposed no limitation on this delegation. The relocation decision was governed by a collective agreement, which is binding and not subject to review unless extended to non-parties. The Labour Court's finding of unlawful delegation was incorrect, and its judgment was...
- Citation
- [2019] ZALAC 64
- Parties
- Appellant: Thabang Mampane, N.O; Appellant: National Lotteries Commission; Appellant: The Board of the National Lotteries Commission; Appellant: Khau Moloko, NO; Respondent: National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers ("NUPSAW"); Respondent: Kelebogile Mokgatlha
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2019
- Case Number
- JA51/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Labour Court judgment set aside; application dismissed; costs awarded against first respondent.
- Judges
- Waglay, Murphy, Kathree-Setiloane
- Legal Topics
- Delegation of Powers, Collective Agreement, Internal Appeal Rights, Review of Administrative Action, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thabang Mampane, N.O
Appellant
National Lotteries Commission
Appellant
The Board of the National Lotteries Commission
Appellant
Khau Moloko, NO
Appellant
National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers ("NUPSAW")
Respondent
Kelebogile Mokgatlha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commissioner lawfully delegated authority to the Human Capital Manager to decide the employee's appeal against relocation.
- 2 Whether the employee had a right to an internal appeal against the decision to relocate her under the policy or law.
- 3 Whether the decision to refuse the appeal was ultra vires and void.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that the evidence did not establish any right for the employee to an internal appeal against the relocation decision under the policy or otherwise. Even if such a right existed, the Commissioner personally reconsidered the appeal. Furthermore, the Commissioner had statutory authority under section 2D of the Lotteries Act to delegate powers to the Human Capital Manager, and clause 9 of the policy imposed no limitation on this delegation. The relocation decision was governed by a collective agreement, which is binding and not subject to review unless extended to non-parties. The Labour Court's finding of unlawful delegation was incorrect, and its judgment was...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Labour Court judgment set aside; application dismissed; costs awarded against first respondent.
Orders
- The appeal succeeds and the orders of the Labour Court are set aside and substituted with: (a) The application is dismissed. (b) The first applicant (NUPSAW) is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
- The first respondent (NUPSAW) is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment