Mampane NO and Others v National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers (NUPSAW) and Another; In re: National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers (NUPSAW) and Another v Mampane NO and Others (JR671/2016) [2018] ZALCJHB 182 (11 May 2018)
The court found that there is some prospect that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding whether a binding collective agreement confirmed the redeployment of the second respondent to Kwa-Zulu Natal. On this basis, leave to appeal was granted. The court was not persuaded that another court would likely differ on the issues of ratification and delegation of authority, but granted leave to appeal on all grounds since the application was unopposed and the interests of justice favoured allowing the appeal.
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 182
- Parties
- Applicant: Thabang Mampane N.O; Applicant: National Lotteries Commission; Applicant: Board of the National Lotteries Commission; Applicant: Khau Moloko N.O; Respondent: National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers (NUPSAW); Respondent: Kelebogile Mokgatlha
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2018
- Case Number
- JR 671/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment on Review
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against the judgment of 18 January 2018 is granted.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Collective Agreement, Redeployment, Delegation of Authority, Ultra Vires, Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thabang Mampane N.O
Applicant
National Lotteries Commission
Applicant
Board of the National Lotteries Commission
Applicant
Khau Moloko N.O
Applicant
National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers (NUPSAW)
Respondent
Kelebogile Mokgatlha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a binding collective agreement confirming the redeployment of the second respondent to Kwa-Zulu Natal.
- 2 Whether the first applicant ratified or confirmed the redeployment decision of 18 November 2015.
- 3 Whether the first applicant delegated authority to the fourth applicant to consider deviation requests.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there is some prospect that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding whether a binding collective agreement confirmed the redeployment of the second respondent to Kwa-Zulu Natal. On this basis, leave to appeal was granted. The court was not persuaded that another court would likely differ on the issues of ratification and delegation of authority, but granted leave to appeal on all grounds since the application was unopposed and the interests of justice favoured allowing the appeal.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against the judgment of 18 January 2018 is granted.
Orders
- Leave to appeal against the judgment handed down on 18 January 2018 is granted.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment