Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality v Constable and Others (3667/2019) [2020] ZAFSHC 172 (31 July 2020)
The court found that the fourth respondent was properly cited and served, and her opposition was not convincing. Despite her claims of non-involvement, she failed to take reasonable steps to resolve the matter, such as consenting to removal or confronting the person who provided her details. The applicant made out a proper case for the relief sought, including the removal of the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh respondents as community representatives and the confirmation of the interdict. The application was unopposed as to the other respondents, and there was no reason not to grant the orders as prayed. The applicant did not insist on costs against the fourth respondent due to her...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAFSHC 172
- Parties
- Applicant: Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Donald Constable; Respondent: Ward 47 Business Forum; Respondent: Santies van Wyk; Respondent: Alice Mabaso; Respondent: Johan de Bruyn; Respondent: Fanie van D Walt; Respondent: Nthabiseng Mancotywa; Respondent: Mokgadi Kganakga; Respondent: Calandra Trading 621 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: All Other Respondents Present THE IPNT BUS DEPOT PROJECT SITE
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2020
- Case Number
- 3667/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Return Date of Rule Nisi; Confirmation and Final Relief
- Outcome
- Rule nisi confirmed; interdict and removal orders granted; costs awarded against specified respondents.
- Judges
- Mhlambi
- Legal Topics
- Interdict, Community Representation, Project Steering Committee, Removal of Representatives, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality
Applicant
Donald Constable
Respondent
Ward 47 Business Forum
Respondent
Santies van Wyk
Respondent
Alice Mabaso
Respondent
Johan de Bruyn
Respondent
Fanie van D Walt
Respondent
Nthabiseng Mancotywa
Respondent
Mokgadi Kganakga
Respondent
Calandra Trading 621 (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
All Other Respondents Present THE IPNT BUS DEPOT PROJECT SITE
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Return Date of Rule Nisi; Confirmation and Final Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents should be interdicted from entering and disrupting the IPTN Bus Depot Project Site.
- 2 Whether the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh respondents should be removed as community representatives of Ward 47 in the Project Steering Committee.
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the respondents opposing the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the fourth respondent was properly cited and served, and her opposition was not convincing. Despite her claims of non-involvement, she failed to take reasonable steps to resolve the matter, such as consenting to removal or confronting the person who provided her details. The applicant made out a proper case for the relief sought, including the removal of the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh respondents as community representatives and the confirmation of the interdict. The application was unopposed as to the other respondents, and there was no reason not to grant the orders as prayed. The applicant did not insist on costs against the fourth respondent due to her...
Court Disposition
Rule nisi confirmed; interdict and removal orders granted; costs awarded against specified respondents.
Orders
- The rule nisi granted on 14 August 2019 is confirmed.
- The fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh respondents are removed as the community representatives of Ward 47 in the Project Steering Committee, and four new members are to be elected or nominated within five days of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment