Manuel v Loubser and Others (10013/08) [2012] ZAWCHC 65 (20 March 2012)
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the bull which caused the collision belonged to the second defendant and was under the control of the third defendant. The evidence established that the gate was negligently left open, allowing the bull to escape onto the public road. The procedures for securing gates on the farm were inadequate, with not every gate having its own lock and bale rope being used as an alternative, increasing the margin for error. There was no fence restricting cattle movement to the gate, and credible evidence showed that gates were sometimes left open. The court rejected the third defendant's contradictory and unreliable evidence regarding ownership,...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAWCHC 65
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Stanley Laurence Manuel; Defendant: Pieter Eduard Loubser; Defendant: PE Loubser Boerdery (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Jacob Eliza De Villiers Loubser; Defendant: Mosselbank Plase (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Melt Jacobus Loubser
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2012
- Case Number
- 10013/08
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Second defendant held causally liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff; absolution from the instance granted for first, third, fourth, and fifth defendants; costs awarded as specified.
- Judges
- Meer
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Liability for Animals, Duty of Care, Public Road Safety
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanley Laurence Manuel
Plaintiff
Pieter Eduard Loubser
Defendant
PE Loubser Boerdery (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Jacob Eliza De Villiers Loubser
Defendant
Mosselbank Plase (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Melt Jacobus Loubser
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants owed a duty of care to prevent cattle from straying onto the public road.
- 2 Whether the defendants were negligent in allowing the bull to escape onto the Klipheuwel Road.
- 3 Whether the bull that caused the collision belonged to the second defendant and was under the control of the third defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the bull which caused the collision belonged to the second defendant and was under the control of the third defendant. The evidence established that the gate was negligently left open, allowing the bull to escape onto the public road. The procedures for securing gates on the farm were inadequate, with not every gate having its own lock and bale rope being used as an alternative, increasing the margin for error. There was no fence restricting cattle movement to the gate, and credible evidence showed that gates were sometimes left open. The court rejected the third defendant's contradictory and unreliable evidence regarding ownership,...
Court Disposition
Second defendant held causally liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff; absolution from the instance granted for first, third, fourth, and fifth defendants; costs awarded as specified.
Orders
- The Second Defendant is causally liable for any damages sustained by the plaintiff as a consequence of the collision between the motorcycle driven by the Plaintiff and a bull on 4 July 2005.
- Absolution from the instance is granted against the First, Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment