Manyeleti Consulting SA (Pty) Ltd v Eskom Holdings SOC Limited (50885/2021) [2025] ZAGPJHC 165 (20 February 2025)
The court found that no dispute existed prior to the launching of the provisional sentence summons, as Eskom only raised defences in its opposing affidavit. Both parties expressly agreed to the appointment of Adv Leech SC as adjudicator, thereby electing to proceed with adjudication. The court determined that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 165
- Parties
- Applicant: Manyeleti Consulting SA (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eskom Holdings SOC Limited
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2025
- Case Number
- 50885/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Provisional Sentence Proceedings Pending Adjudication
- Outcome
- Provisional sentence proceedings stayed pending adjudication; referral to adjudication confirmed; costs reserved.
- Judges
- Wright
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Sentence, Contractual Dispute Resolution, Adjudication Clauses, Stay of Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manyeleti Consulting SA (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Eskom Holdings SOC Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Provisional Sentence Proceedings Pending Adjudication
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the provisional sentence proceedings should be stayed pending adjudication under the contract.
- 2 Whether Manyeleti's referral to adjudication was valid and timeous.
- 3 Whether Eskom is entitled to resist provisional sentence on the basis of contractual dispute resolution mechanisms.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that no dispute existed prior to the launching of the provisional sentence summons, as Eskom only raised defences in its opposing affidavit. Both parties expressly agreed to the appointment of Adv Leech SC as adjudicator, thereby electing to proceed with adjudication. The court determined that the provisional sentence proceedings should be stayed pending the outcome of adjudication and any subsequent tribunal hearing. The referral by Manyeleti to Adv Leech SC was held to be a valid contractual referral. Costs in all related applications were reserved for determination after adjudication.
Court Disposition
Provisional sentence proceedings stayed pending adjudication; referral to adjudication confirmed; costs reserved.
Orders
- The provisional sentence proceedings are stayed pending adjudication and any consequent tribunal hearing.
- The adjudication referral by Manyeleti dated 18 February 2022 to Adv Leech SC stands as a referral to adjudication before Adv Leech SC.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment