Mapeka v Firstrand Bank Limited (Wesbank) (NCT/14020/2014/141(1)) [2014] ZANCT 44 (11 November 2014)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent did not comply with the termination and enforcement procedures set out in the National Credit Act when selling the Applicant's vehicle. However, the Tribunal noted that the conduct occurred in 2008, and section 166 of the Act prohibits referral of matters to the Tribunal after three years. The NCR had already taken enforcement action by securing an undertaking from Wesbank and the Applicant accepted the offer to write off the debt and clear his credit record. The NCR issued a notice of non-referral, and the Tribunal concluded that it was precluded from granting the relief sought due to the time-bar and the prior resolution of the dispute.
- Citation
- [2014] ZANCT 44
- Parties
- Applicant: Sello Stephen Mapeka; Respondent: Firstrand Bank Limited (Wesbank)
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2014
- Case Number
- NCT/14020/2014/141(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Refer Prohibited Conduct to Tribunal Under Section 141(1)(b) of the National Credit Act
- Outcome
- Application dismissed due to time-bar under section 166 and prior resolution by the NCR.
- Judges
- LA Best, B Dumisa, J Simpson
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Prohibited Conduct, Condonation, Notice of Non Referral, Enforcement Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sello Stephen Mapeka
Applicant
Firstrand Bank Limited (Wesbank)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Refer Prohibited Conduct to Tribunal Under Section 141(1)(b) of the National Credit Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent's sale of the Applicant's vehicle complied with the termination and enforcement procedures under the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the Applicant is entitled to a finding of prohibited conduct and a certificate under section 164(3) of the Act.
- 3 Whether the matter is time-barred under section 166 of the National Credit Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent did not comply with the termination and enforcement procedures set out in the National Credit Act when selling the Applicant's vehicle. However, the Tribunal noted that the conduct occurred in 2008, and section 166 of the Act prohibits referral of matters to the Tribunal after three years. The NCR had already taken enforcement action by securing an undertaking from Wesbank and the Applicant accepted the offer to write off the debt and clear his credit record. The NCR issued a notice of non-referral, and the Tribunal concluded that it was precluded from granting the relief sought due to the time-bar and the prior resolution of the dispute.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed due to time-bar under section 166 and prior resolution by the NCR.
Orders
- The application for leave to refer the matter directly to the Tribunal is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment