Mapengo v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR362/2014) [2015] ZALCJHB 335 (30 September 2015)
The Labour Court found that the applicant was constructively dismissed. The evidence showed that the applicant was placed in an intolerable position by the employer, specifically by the conduct of Advocate Motimele, who changed his stance regarding the applicant's qualifications and failed to rebut the applicant's testimony at arbitration. The applicant did not misrepresent his qualifications and was assured that his lack of admission could be resolved. The Board's decision to relieve the applicant of his position, pending investigation, and the lack of direct evidence from Motimele supported the applicant's claim. The Commissioner erred in finding that no dismissal occurred. The award...
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCJHB 335
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenneth Mapengo; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Thembekile Nsibanyoni; Respondent: BLA-Legal Education Trust
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2015
- Case Number
- JR362/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The applicant was constructively dismissed. The arbitration award is set aside and the matter is remitted to the CCMA for determination of the fairness of the dismissal.
- Judges
- Rabkin-Naicker
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Onus of Proof, Jurisdiction of Ccma, Trust Deed Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Mapengo
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Thembekile Nsibanyoni
Respondent
BLA-Legal Education Trust
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was constructively dismissed by the employer.
- 2 Whether the CCMA had jurisdiction to entertain the dispute.
- 3 Whether the employer's conduct made continued employment intolerable for the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court found that the applicant was constructively dismissed. The evidence showed that the applicant was placed in an intolerable position by the employer, specifically by the conduct of Advocate Motimele, who changed his stance regarding the applicant's qualifications and failed to rebut the applicant's testimony at arbitration. The applicant did not misrepresent his qualifications and was assured that his lack of admission could be resolved. The Board's decision to relieve the applicant of his position, pending investigation, and the lack of direct evidence from Motimele supported the applicant's claim. The Commissioner erred in finding that no dismissal occurred. The award...
Court Disposition
The applicant was constructively dismissed. The arbitration award is set aside and the matter is remitted to the CCMA for determination of the fairness of the dismissal.
Orders
- The applicant was dismissed by the third respondent.
- The Award under Case number GAJB 1149-13 is reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment