Marais v Road Accident Fund (2540/2021) [2025] ZAWCHC 324 (30 July 2025)

Marais v Road Accident Fund (2540/2021) [2025] ZAWCHC 324 (30 July 2025)

The court found that the Road Accident Fund's refusal to pay the disputed portion of the plaintiff's claim for past medical and related expenses was not supported by law. The RAF's reliance on internal directives and the classification of certain expenses as prescribed minimum benefits or emergency medical care did not absolve it of liability under the common law or the RAF Act. The plaintiff's hospital plan was not a comprehensive medical aid, and the evidence established that the disputed expenses were reasonable, necessary, and directly related to the accident. The court held that the RAF remains liable for such expenses. Regarding future medical expenses, the court ordered that the...

Citation
[2025] ZAWCHC 324
Parties
Plaintiff: Johann Marais; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 July 2025
Case Number
2540/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
The plaintiff's claim for personally paid past medical, hospital, and related expenses is upheld. The defendant is ordered to pay the capital sum and provide an unrestricted statutory undertaking for future medical expenses. Costs are awarded to the plaintiff.
Judges
Cloete
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Quantum of Damages, Future Medical Expenses, Prescribed Minimum Benefits, Statutory Undertaking, Hospital Plan Vs Medical Aid
Delict Civil Procedure Land and Property Road Accident Fund Act Quantum of Damages Future Medical Expenses Prescribed Minimum Benefits Statutory Undertaking +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johann Marais

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Road Accident Fund is liable for the disputed portion of the plaintiff's claim for privately paid past medical and related expenses incurred as a direct result of the collision.
  2. 2 Whether the Road Accident Fund's refusal to pay certain expenses based on internal directives and prescribed minimum benefits is legally valid.
  3. 3 What are the proper terms of the statutory undertaking to be furnished by the Road Accident Fund under section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act for future medical expenses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Road Accident Fund's refusal to pay the disputed portion of the plaintiff's claim for past medical and related expenses was not supported by law. The RAF's reliance on internal directives and the classification of certain expenses as prescribed minimum benefits or emergency medical care did not absolve it of liability under the common law or the RAF Act. The plaintiff's hospital plan was not a comprehensive medical aid, and the evidence established that the disputed expenses were reasonable, necessary, and directly related to the accident. The court held that the RAF remains liable for such expenses. Regarding future medical expenses, the court ordered that the...

Court Disposition

The plaintiff's claim for personally paid past medical, hospital, and related expenses is upheld. The defendant is ordered to pay the capital sum and provide an unrestricted statutory undertaking for future medical expenses. Costs are awarded to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff, in respect of personally paid past medical, hospital and related expenses, a total sum of R1,465,152.18.
  • Payment of the capital sum shall be effected directly into the trust account of the plaintiff's attorneys of record by electronic transfer within 180 calendar days from the date of this order. Interest at the statutory rate per annum applies to any outstanding amount from 14 days after this order.