Maribo Media (Pty) Ltd v Body Corporate of the Chartwell Centre Scheme (1456/2012) [2013] ZAKZDHC 78 (8 January 2013)
The court found that the municipal approval for the advertising billboards expired on 31 August 2012, rendering their continued display illegal under the relevant bylaws. The applicant's submission of a doctored approval document was unacceptable and undermined its credibility. The court held that, although the general rule is that municipal bylaws must be pleaded and proved, this requirement may be relaxed where the bylaw's existence is brought to the court's attention and is central to the dispute. The principle of legality prevails over contractual provisions, and the lease cannot be enforced to require unlawful conduct. The interim relief previously granted was based on incomplete and...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAKZDHC 78
- Parties
- Applicant: Maribo Media (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Body Corporate of the Chartwell Centre Scheme
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 January 2013
- Case Number
- 1456/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interlocutory Application to Discharge Interim Relief; Counter Application
- Outcome
- Interim relief discharged; applicant's counter-application dismissed; costs awarded against applicant.
- Judges
- Vahed
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Bylaws, Lease Agreement Termination, Interim Interdict, Illegality of Advertising Structures, Judicial Notice of Bylaws, Principle of Legality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maribo Media (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Body Corporate of the Chartwell Centre Scheme
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interlocutory Application to Discharge Interim Relief; Counter Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the continued display of advertising billboards after expiry of municipal approval is illegal under applicable bylaws.
- 2 Whether the respondent was entitled to discharge the interim interdict granted in favour of the applicant.
- 3 Whether the applicant's counter-application to compel the respondent to re-apply for municipal approval should be granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the municipal approval for the advertising billboards expired on 31 August 2012, rendering their continued display illegal under the relevant bylaws. The applicant's submission of a doctored approval document was unacceptable and undermined its credibility. The court held that, although the general rule is that municipal bylaws must be pleaded and proved, this requirement may be relaxed where the bylaw's existence is brought to the court's attention and is central to the dispute. The principle of legality prevails over contractual provisions, and the lease cannot be enforced to require unlawful conduct. The interim relief previously granted was based on incomplete and...
Court Disposition
Interim relief discharged; applicant's counter-application dismissed; costs awarded against applicant.
Orders
- Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the order made on 20 February 2012 under case number 1456/2012 are deleted and replaced with: '2. The costs of the opposed hearing on 20 February 2012 are to be paid by the applicant. All other costs are reserved for the decision of the court finally deciding the application.'
- The conditional counter-application dated 26 October 2012 is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment