Mashao and Others v South African Local Government and Others (JR2234/23) [2025] ZALCJHB 134 (11 March 2025)
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCJHB 134
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- M Makhura
- Case number
- JR2234/23
More details
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- M Makhura
- Case number
- JR2234/23
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant filed the application for leave to appeal within the prescribed period but failed to comply with the further procedural requirements of Rule 67, specifically service on the secretary to the judge and filing of submissions. Non-compliance with these mandatory rules renders the application defective. The Labour Court cannot entertain an application that does not comply with its rules, and accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must be struck from the roll.
Court disposition
Application for leave to appeal struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.
02
Material facts
Parties
Malebana Edwin Mashao and Others
ApplicantSouth African Local Government Bargaining Council
RespondentMatlala, L N.O.
RespondentEkurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Condonation and Review Application
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant complied with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules in filing the application for leave to appeal.
- 02
Whether the application for leave to appeal should be entertained despite non-compliance with procedural requirements.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant filed the application for leave to appeal within the prescribed 15-day period following the judgment dismissing condonation and the review application. No submissions were filed as required by Rule 67(5), and no proof of service on the secretary to the judge was provided.
- Respondent
- The respondents did not file opposing submissions, but the record shows the applicant failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Rule 67, including service and filing of submissions.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 67(3) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court
An application for leave to appeal must be brought within 15 days after the date of judgment.
- 02
Rule 67(4) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court
Service of the application for leave to appeal must be effected on the secretary to the judge from whom leave is sought or on the secretary of any other judge in the seat where the matter was heard.
- 03
Rule 67(5) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court
Submissions in support of the application for leave to appeal must be filed within 10 days of filing the application.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant filed the application for leave to appeal within the prescribed period but failed to comply with the further procedural requirements of Rule 67, specifically service on the secretary to the judge and filing of submissions. Non-compliance with these mandatory rules renders the application defective. The Labour Court cannot entertain an application that does not comply with its rules, and accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must be struck from the roll.
Obiter and limits
- Strict compliance with procedural rules is required in applications for leave to appeal before the Labour Court.
- Failure to serve and file submissions as required by the rules will result in the application being struck from the roll.
Court disposition
Application for leave to appeal struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.
- The application for leave to appeal is struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.
Source and reliance status
Labour Court Johannesburg
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Labour Court Johannesburg
Order
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
Not Reportable
Case No. JR2234/23
In the matter between:
MALEBANA
EDWIN MASHAO AND OTHERS Applicant
and
SOUTH
AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BARGAINING
COUNCIL
First Respondent
MATLALA, L N.O.
Second Respondent
EKURHULENI
METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Third Respondent
Heard: In Chambers
Delivered: 11 March 2025
JUDGMENT: APPLICATION
FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
MAKHURA, J
[1] This is an application for leave to appeal the whole of the ex tempore judgment and order issued on 23 October 2024. In terms of that judgment, this Court dismissed the applicant’s application
for condonation and with it, the review application.
[2] The applicant’s application for leave to appeal was filed on 13 November 2024. In terms of Rule 67(3) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court, the application for leave to appeal must be brought within 15 days after the date of judgment. The application was filed within the 15-day period.
[3] Rule 67(4) requires that service of the application for leave to appeal to be effected on the secretary to the judge from whom leave to appeal is sought or on the secretary of any other judge in the seat where the matter was heard. The applicant did not provide proof of this and did not serve the application on the secretary.
[4] The applicant has also not complied with Rule 67(5), which provides that submissions should be filed within 10 days of filing the application for leave to appeal. The applicant has to date not filed the submissions. The application does not comply with the rules of this Court. It therefore falls to be struck from the roll.
[5] In the premises, the following order is made:
Order:
1. The application for leave to appeal is struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.
M. Makhura
Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.