Download PDF

South Africa Order

Labour Court Johannesburg

Mashao and Others v South African Local Government and Others (JR2234/23) [2025] ZALCJHB 134 (11 March 2025)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant filed the application for leave to appeal within the prescribed period but failed to comply with the further procedural requirements of Rule 67, specifically service on the secretary to the judge and filing of submissions. Non-compliance with these mandatory rules renders the application defective. The Labour Court cannot entertain an application that does not comply with its rules, and accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must be struck from the roll.

Court disposition

Application for leave to appeal struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.

02

Material facts

Parties

Malebana Edwin Mashao and Others

Applicant

South African Local Government Bargaining Council

Respondent

Matlala, L N.O.

Respondent

Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Condonation and Review Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant filed the application for leave to appeal within the prescribed 15-day period following the judgment dismissing condonation and the review application. No submissions were filed as required by Rule 67(5), and no proof of service on the secretary to the judge was provided.
Respondent
The respondents did not file opposing submissions, but the record shows the applicant failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Rule 67, including service and filing of submissions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 67(3) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court

    An application for leave to appeal must be brought within 15 days after the date of judgment.

  2. 02

    Rule 67(4) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court

    Service of the application for leave to appeal must be effected on the secretary to the judge from whom leave is sought or on the secretary of any other judge in the seat where the matter was heard.

  3. 03

    Rule 67(5) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court

    Submissions in support of the application for leave to appeal must be filed within 10 days of filing the application.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant filed the application for leave to appeal within the prescribed period but failed to comply with the further procedural requirements of Rule 67, specifically service on the secretary to the judge and filing of submissions. Non-compliance with these mandatory rules renders the application defective. The Labour Court cannot entertain an application that does not comply with its rules, and accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must be struck from the roll.

Obiter and limits

  • Strict compliance with procedural rules is required in applications for leave to appeal before the Labour Court.
  • Failure to serve and file submissions as required by the rules will result in the application being struck from the roll.

Court disposition

Application for leave to appeal struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.

  • The application for leave to appeal is struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.

Source and reliance status

Labour Court Johannesburg

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Labour Court Johannesburg

Order

[2025] ZALCJHB 134

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

Not Reportable

Case No. JR2234/23

In the matter between:

MALEBANA

EDWIN MASHAO AND OTHERS Applicant

and

SOUTH

AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT

BARGAINING

COUNCIL

First Respondent

MATLALA, L N.O.

Second Respondent

EKURHULENI

METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Third Respondent

Heard: In Chambers

Delivered: 11 March 2025

JUDGMENT: APPLICATION

FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

MAKHURA, J

[1] This is an application for leave to appeal the whole of the ex tempore judgment and order issued on 23 October 2024. In terms of that judgment, this Court dismissed the applicant’s application

for condonation and with it, the review application.

[2] The applicant’s application for leave to appeal was filed on 13 November 2024. In terms of Rule 67(3) of the Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court, the application for leave to appeal must be brought within 15 days after the date of judgment. The application was filed within the 15-day period.

[3] Rule 67(4) requires that service of the application for leave to appeal to be effected on the secretary to the judge from whom leave to appeal is sought or on the secretary of any other judge in the seat where the matter was heard. The applicant did not provide proof of this and did not serve the application on the secretary.

[4] The applicant has also not complied with Rule 67(5), which provides that submissions should be filed within 10 days of filing the application for leave to appeal. The applicant has to date not filed the submissions. The application does not comply with the rules of this Court. It therefore falls to be struck from the roll.

[5] In the premises, the following order is made:

Order:

1. The application for leave to appeal is struck from the roll for non-compliance with Rule 67 of the Labour Court rules.

M. Makhura

Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rules Regulating the Conduct of the Proceedings of the Labour Court

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.