Mashinini v Member of the Executive Council for Health, Gauteng Province (1352/2017) [2021] ZAGPJHC 11 (25 January 2021)
The court found that the plaintiff suffered significant physical and psychological harm due to negligent surgery performed at a public hospital. Liability was admitted by the defendant, leaving only the quantification of damages in dispute. The court accepted expert evidence regarding the plaintiff's ongoing medical needs and the impact on her career and quality of life. Applying the public healthcare defence, the court held that future specialist surgical services could be provided at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital at the same or better standard than the private sector, and thus ordered the MEC to render those services in kind. However, for psychiatric, psychological,...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 11
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mashinini, Nomgqibelo Nelly; Defendant: Member of the Executive Council for Health, Gauteng Province
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2021
- Case Number
- 1352/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Delictual Action / Quantification of Damages After Liability Admitted
- Outcome
- Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for monetary compensation and orders for future medical services.
- Judges
- Adams
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Quantification of Damages, Public Healthcare Defence, Future Medical Expenses, Loss of Earning Capacity, General Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mashinini, Nomgqibelo Nelly
Plaintiff
Member of the Executive Council for Health, Gauteng Province
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Delictual Action / Quantification of Damages After Liability Admitted
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the plaintiff's injuries resulting from negligent surgery.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to monetary compensation for future medical expenses or should accept services in kind from the public healthcare system.
- 3 How should future loss of earnings and general damages be calculated given the plaintiff's career trajectory and medical condition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff suffered significant physical and psychological harm due to negligent surgery performed at a public hospital. Liability was admitted by the defendant, leaving only the quantification of damages in dispute. The court accepted expert evidence regarding the plaintiff's ongoing medical needs and the impact on her career and quality of life. Applying the public healthcare defence, the court held that future specialist surgical services could be provided at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital at the same or better standard than the private sector, and thus ordered the MEC to render those services in kind. However, for psychiatric, psychological,...
Court Disposition
Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for monetary compensation and orders for future medical services.
Orders
- The plaintiff’s claim for past hospital and medical expenses is postponed sine die.
- The MEC is directed to ensure that the services and items listed under Specialist Surgeon’s Expenses in the reports of Professor Damon Bizos and Dr B H Pienaar, and in their joint minute, are rendered to and procured for Mrs Mashinini by Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital as and when required at the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment