Masike and Others v Red Ant Security Relocation and Eviction Services Proprietary Limited and Another (04238/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1460 (18 December 2023)
The court found that the applicants were evicted from the property on 11 October 2023 without a valid court order, rendering the eviction unlawful and unconstitutional. The respondents failed to dispute the factual basis of the applicants' claims, and the first respondent participated in the eviction and demolition of homes. The municipality acknowledged its constitutional duties but failed to provide any substantiated explanation for its inability to offer emergency accommodation. The court held that constitutional rights to housing, dignity, and protection against arbitrary deprivation of property were infringed. Urgent relief was justified given the applicants' dire circumstances and...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 1460
- Parties
- Applicant: Chakenyane Jonas Masike; Applicant: Evictees of the Farm Quaggasfontein Alias Lapdoorns 548 Sebokeng, Gauteng (2nd to 19th Applicants); Respondent: Red Ant Security Relocation and Eviction Services Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Emfuleni Local Municipality
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2023
- Case Number
- 04238/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Reasons for Order Following Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. The eviction was declared unlawful. Respondents ordered to restore applicants and provide emergency accommodation. Costs awarded jointly and severally against respondents.
- Judges
- Robin Pearse
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Eviction, Right to Housing, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act, Constitutional Damages, Municipal Obligations, Urgent Interdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chakenyane Jonas Masike
Applicant
Evictees of the Farm Quaggasfontein Alias Lapdoorns 548 Sebokeng, Gauteng (2nd to 19th Applicants)
Applicant
Red Ant Security Relocation and Eviction Services Proprietary Limited
Respondent
Emfuleni Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Reasons for Order Following Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the eviction of the applicants from the property on 11 October 2023 was unlawful and unconstitutional.
- 2 Whether the respondents are obliged to restore the applicants to the property and provide emergency accommodation.
- 3 Whether the respondents are liable for the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were evicted from the property on 11 October 2023 without a valid court order, rendering the eviction unlawful and unconstitutional. The respondents failed to dispute the factual basis of the applicants' claims, and the first respondent participated in the eviction and demolition of homes. The municipality acknowledged its constitutional duties but failed to provide any substantiated explanation for its inability to offer emergency accommodation. The court held that constitutional rights to housing, dignity, and protection against arbitrary deprivation of property were infringed. Urgent relief was justified given the applicants' dire circumstances and...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The eviction was declared unlawful. Respondents ordered to restore applicants and provide emergency accommodation. Costs awarded jointly and severally against respondents.
Orders
- Non-compliance with court rules condoned under rule 6(12)(a).
- Eviction of applicants from the property on 11 October 2023 declared unlawful.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment