Matini v Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health Eastern Cape Province - Costs (169/2017) [2023] ZAECBHC 31 (19 August 2023)

Matini v Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health Eastern Cape Province - Costs (169/2017) [2023] ZAECBHC 31 (19 August 2023)

The court found that the defendant's conduct throughout the litigation was marked by persistent disregard for court rules, case management directives, and specific orders, resulting in substantial prejudice to the plaintiff and unnecessary delay in the resolution of the matter. The defendant failed to comply with multiple directives to file expert notices and reports, and her applications for rescission and condonation were removed from the roll without a tender of costs, contrary to procedural expectations. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to costs on the attorney and client scale for the rule 30A application, including reserved costs, and to party and party costs for the...

Citation
[2023] ZAECBHC 31
Parties
Applicant: Luzuko Matini; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health Eastern Cape Province
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 August 2023
Case Number
169/2017
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Interlocutory, Determination of Costs Following Interlocutory and Case Management Applications
Outcome
Plaintiff's application for costs is granted. Defendant is ordered to pay costs as specified.
Judges
Hartle
Legal Topics
Costs Award, Punitive Costs, Case Management Directives, Rule 30a Application, Removal of Application, State Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Luzuko Matini

Applicant

Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health Eastern Cape Province

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Costs Application / Post Interlocutory, Determination of Costs Following Interlocutory and Case Management Applications

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs on a punitive scale for the rule 30A application due to the defendant's persistent non-compliance with court orders and directives.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is liable for costs occasioned by the removal of her applications from the roll without a tender of costs.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff's requests for condonation and supplementary affidavits should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant's conduct throughout the litigation was marked by persistent disregard for court rules, case management directives, and specific orders, resulting in substantial prejudice to the plaintiff and unnecessary delay in the resolution of the matter. The defendant failed to comply with multiple directives to file expert notices and reports, and her applications for rescission and condonation were removed from the roll without a tender of costs, contrary to procedural expectations. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to costs on the attorney and client scale for the rule 30A application, including reserved costs, and to party and party costs for the...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application for costs is granted. Defendant is ordered to pay costs as specified.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the rule 30A application commenced on 30 May 2022 on the scale of attorney and client, including reserved costs of the enrolment of the application on the opposed motion court roll of 24 November 2022.
  • The defendant is liable to pay the costs occasioned by the removal of the application(s) initiated on 19 August 2022 from the motion court roll of 27 September 2022, including the costs of the application in terms of rule 41(1)(c), such costs limited to the party and party scale.