Matlafalang Trainning CC and Another v MEC: Free State, Department of Public Works and Another (5412/2008) [2008] ZAFSHC 136 (11 December 2008)
The court found that the applicants established a prima facie right to review the tender award, as they scored the highest points and no objective criteria were advanced to justify awarding the contract to another tenderer. The respondent's assertion that the applicants' tender was non-compliant did not throw serious doubt on the applicants' case, given the ambiguity in the scope of the program and the requirements. The court held that, absent interim relief, the contract would likely be executed before the review could be heard, resulting in irreparable harm and rendering the review academic. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, and no suitable alternative remedy was...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAFSHC 136
- Parties
- Applicant: Matlafalang Training CC; Applicant: Learners International CC; Respondent: MEC: Free State Department of Public Works; Respondent: Katushya Security Services (Pty) Limited
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2008
- Case Number
- 5412/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review Application
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted suspending execution of the contract pending review.
- Judges
- C.H.G. Van der Merwe
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Tender Review, Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, Administrative Action, Irreparable Harm
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matlafalang Training CC
Applicant
Learners International CC
Applicant
MEC: Free State Department of Public Works
Respondent
Katushya Security Services (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interim interdict suspending execution of the contract pending review.
- 2 Whether the award of the tender complied with the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act and the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the applicants' tender was wrongly excluded from consideration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants established a prima facie right to review the tender award, as they scored the highest points and no objective criteria were advanced to justify awarding the contract to another tenderer. The respondent's assertion that the applicants' tender was non-compliant did not throw serious doubt on the applicants' case, given the ambiguity in the scope of the program and the requirements. The court held that, absent interim relief, the contract would likely be executed before the review could be heard, resulting in irreparable harm and rendering the review academic. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, and no suitable alternative remedy was...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted suspending execution of the contract pending review.
Orders
- The award and execution of the contract under proposal 19: Security training for 137 participants is suspended pending finalisation of the review application to be launched by the applicants.
- The applicants are ordered to launch the review application within 30 days from the date of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment