Matlala v Dlamini and Another (35611/2008) [2010] ZAGPPHC 277 (3 June 2010)
The court found that the requirements for a valid customary marriage under siSwati law were met. Both families agreed on the marriage and the lobolo amount, and the bride was formally handed over to the groom. The fact that the full lobolo was not paid did not invalidate the marriage, as arrangements for payment had been made. The applicant's arguments regarding the surname and the formalities of the handover were rejected based on the evidence and relevant legal principles. The marriage certificate issued by the Department of Home Affairs constituted prima facie proof, and the applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that no marriage existed. Consequently, the court held that a...
- Citation
- [2010] ZAGPPHC 277
- Parties
- Applicant: Matlala Gertrude; Respondent: Dlamini Patricia Bikwaphi; Respondent: The Minister of Finance
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 June 2010
- Case Number
- 35611/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- B.R. Du Plessis
- Legal Topics
- Customary Marriage, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Lobolo Payment, Handing Over of Bride
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matlala Gertrude
Applicant
Dlamini Patricia Bikwaphi
Respondent
The Minister of Finance
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid customary marriage existed between the deceased and the first respondent.
- 2 Whether the first respondent is entitled to benefit from the estate or pension fund of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the requirements for a valid customary marriage under siSwati law were met. Both families agreed on the marriage and the lobolo amount, and the bride was formally handed over to the groom. The fact that the full lobolo was not paid did not invalidate the marriage, as arrangements for payment had been made. The applicant's arguments regarding the surname and the formalities of the handover were rejected based on the evidence and relevant legal principles. The marriage certificate issued by the Department of Home Affairs constituted prima facie proof, and the applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that no marriage existed. Consequently, the court held that a...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment