Matshane v Road Accident Fund (RAF234/16) [2019] ZANWHC 40 (22 March 2019)

Matshane v Road Accident Fund (RAF234/16) [2019] ZANWHC 40 (22 March 2019)

The court found that, despite the absence of direct documentary proof of the deceased's earnings, the evidence presented by the plaintiff's experts was credible and sufficient to establish a prima facie case for loss of support. The actuarial calculations, based on information provided by the plaintiff and supported by the industrial psychologist and chartered accountant, were accepted as the best available evidence. The defendant failed to present any evidence to rebut the plaintiff's case. The court held that the plaintiff suffered a loss of support and that the quantum of damages was appropriately calculated, taking into account contingencies and statutory limits imposed by the Road...

Citation
[2019] ZANWHC 40
Parties
Plaintiff: Pamela Lorato Matshane; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 March 2019
Case Number
RAF234/16
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Close of Plaintiff and Defendant Cases
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; claim for loss of support succeeds.
Judges
D I Matlapeng
Legal Topics
Loss of Support, Quantification of Damages, Road Accident Fund Amendment Act, Best Evidence Rule
Civil Procedure Delict Loss of Support Quantification of Damages Road Accident Fund Amendment Act Best Evidence Rule

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pamela Lorato Matshane

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Judgment After Close of Plaintiff and Defendant Cases

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff suffered a loss of support as a result of the death of her husband in the motor vehicle accident.
  2. 2 Whether the quantum of damages for loss of support has been proven on a balance of probabilities.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of direct documentary proof of the deceased's earnings precludes recovery of damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, despite the absence of direct documentary proof of the deceased's earnings, the evidence presented by the plaintiff's experts was credible and sufficient to establish a prima facie case for loss of support. The actuarial calculations, based on information provided by the plaintiff and supported by the industrial psychologist and chartered accountant, were accepted as the best available evidence. The defendant failed to present any evidence to rebut the plaintiff's case. The court held that the plaintiff suffered a loss of support and that the quantum of damages was appropriately calculated, taking into account contingencies and statutory limits imposed by the Road...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; claim for loss of support succeeds.

Orders

  • The plaintiff succeeds in her claim for 100% of her damages.
  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R212,858.00 for past loss of support and R1,237,836.00 for future loss of support.