Mavericks Revue CC and Others v Director General of the Department of Home Affairs and Another (22369/11) [2012] ZAWCHC 5 (3 February 2012)
The court found that the Director-General's withdrawal of Mavericks' corporate permits was lawful and based on good and reasonable cause, including the absence of employment contracts, failure to notify the Department when workers left, and non-compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements. The applicants failed to demonstrate any prima facie right to interim relief or prospects of success in the intended review. The procedural irregularity alleged regarding the notification form was not material and did not invalidate the withdrawal decision. The balance of convenience and irreparable harm considerations weighed against granting interim relief, as Mavericks continued to operate...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAWCHC 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Mavericks Revue CC; Applicant: Diana Gorgos; Applicant: Irina Yatsenko; Applicant: Patrizia Meynet; Respondent: Director-General of the Department of Home Affairs; Respondent: Minister of Home Affairs
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2012
- Case Number
- 22369/11
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Relief Pending Review Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel, payable jointly and severally by the applicants. Respondents to forward the judgment and record to the Human Rights Commission.
- Judges
- Desai
- Legal Topics
- Immigration Permits, Procedural Fairness, Review of Administrative Action, Employment Contracts, Interim Interdict, Human Rights Concerns
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mavericks Revue CC
Applicant
Diana Gorgos
Applicant
Irina Yatsenko
Applicant
Patrizia Meynet
Applicant
Director-General of the Department of Home Affairs
Respondent
Minister of Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Relief Pending Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the withdrawal of Mavericks' corporate permits by the Director-General of Home Affairs was lawful and procedurally fair.
- 2 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie right to interim relief pending review.
- 3 Whether the contracts between Mavericks and the foreign dancers comply with statutory requirements for employment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Director-General's withdrawal of Mavericks' corporate permits was lawful and based on good and reasonable cause, including the absence of employment contracts, failure to notify the Department when workers left, and non-compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements. The applicants failed to demonstrate any prima facie right to interim relief or prospects of success in the intended review. The procedural irregularity alleged regarding the notification form was not material and did not invalidate the withdrawal decision. The balance of convenience and irreparable harm considerations weighed against granting interim relief, as Mavericks continued to operate...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel, payable jointly and severally by the applicants. Respondents to forward the judgment and record to the Human Rights Commission.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
- Costs to include costs of two counsel, payable jointly and severally by the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment