Mayelane v Ngwenyama and Another (CCT 57/12) [2013] ZACC 14; 2013 (4) SA 415 (CC); 2013 (8) BCLR 918 (CC) (30 May 2013)
The Constitutional Court held that, under Xitsonga customary law and the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, the consent of the first wife is necessary for the validity of a subsequent customary marriage. The Court found that neither the Recognition Act nor Xitsonga custom, as previously interpreted, expressly required such consent, but constitutional principles of equality and dignity demand its inclusion. The Court developed Xitsonga customary law to require the first wife's consent for the validity of further customary marriages, aligning customary law with constitutional values. The order operates prospectively to avoid unfair prejudice to existing marriages. On the facts, the...
- Citation
- [2013] ZACC 14
- Parties
- Applicant: Modjadji Florah Mayelane; Respondent: Mphephu Maria Ngwenyama; Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2013
- Case Number
- CCT 57/12
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Constitutional Court Judgment on Appeal From Supreme Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. The Supreme Court of Appeal's order declaring the second marriage valid is set aside. The second marriage is declared null and void. Xitsonga customary law is developed to require the first wife's consent for validity of subsequent customary marriages, prospectively.
- Judges
- Froneman, Khampepe, Skweyiya, Moseneke, Cameron, Yacoob, Zondo, Jafta, Mogoeng, Nkabinde
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Customary Law Development, Equality and Dignity, Validity of Polygynous Marriages, Consent Requirement, Gender Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Modjadji Florah Mayelane
Applicant
Mphephu Maria Ngwenyama
Respondent
Minister for Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Constitutional Court Judgment on Appeal From Supreme Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the Supreme Court of Appeal have determined the consent issue regarding the validity of the second marriage.
- 2 Is the consent of the first wife necessary for the validity of her husband's subsequent customary marriage under Xitsonga law and the Recognition Act.
- 3 Does the Constitution require the development of Xitsonga customary law to include a consent requirement for subsequent marriages.
Ratio Decidendi
The Constitutional Court held that, under Xitsonga customary law and the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, the consent of the first wife is necessary for the validity of a subsequent customary marriage. The Court found that neither the Recognition Act nor Xitsonga custom, as previously interpreted, expressly required such consent, but constitutional principles of equality and dignity demand its inclusion. The Court developed Xitsonga customary law to require the first wife's consent for the validity of further customary marriages, aligning customary law with constitutional values. The order operates prospectively to avoid unfair prejudice to existing marriages. On the facts, the...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. The Supreme Court of Appeal's order declaring the second marriage valid is set aside. The second marriage is declared null and void. Xitsonga customary law is developed to require the first wife's consent for validity of subsequent customary marriages, prospectively.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted.
- The applicant’s and first amicus applications for condonation are granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment