Mazizini Community and Others v Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Limited and Others (LCC23/2007) [2016] ZALCC 15 (13 September 2016)
The court found that the interlocutory application did not dispose of all the issues in the case and that an appeal would not resolve the real disputes concerning the validity of the land claims. The court was not persuaded that another court would reach a different decision, and therefore held that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the applicant due to the vexatious nature of the application.
- Citation
- [2016] ZALCC 15
- Parties
- Applicant: Mazizini Community; Respondent: Prudhoe Community; Respondent: Tharfield Community; Respondent: Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform; Respondent: Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Sun International (Ciskei) Limited; Respondent: Regional Land Claims Commissioner Eastern Cape
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2016
- Case Number
- LCC 23/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- YS Meer, H Barnes, R Mqeke
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Interlocutory Application, Costs Award, Community Land Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mazizini Community
Applicant
Prudhoe Community
Respondent
Tharfield Community
Respondent
Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform
Respondent
Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Sun International (Ciskei) Limited
Respondent
Regional Land Claims Commissioner Eastern Cape
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the dismissal of an interlocutory application regarding the validity of a land claim.
- 2 Whether the appeal would lead to a just and prompt resolution of the real issues between the parties.
- 3 Whether there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the interlocutory application did not dispose of all the issues in the case and that an appeal would not resolve the real disputes concerning the validity of the land claims. The court was not persuaded that another court would reach a different decision, and therefore held that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the applicant due to the vexatious nature of the application.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment