Mazizini Community and Others v Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Limited and Others (LCC23/2007) [2016] ZALCC 15 (13 September 2016)

Mazizini Community and Others v Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Limited and Others (LCC23/2007) [2016] ZALCC 15 (13 September 2016)

The court found that the interlocutory application did not dispose of all the issues in the case and that an appeal would not resolve the real disputes concerning the validity of the land claims. The court was not persuaded that another court would reach a different decision, and therefore held that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the applicant due to the vexatious nature of the application.

Citation
[2016] ZALCC 15
Parties
Applicant: Mazizini Community; Respondent: Prudhoe Community; Respondent: Tharfield Community; Respondent: Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform; Respondent: Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Sun International (Ciskei) Limited; Respondent: Regional Land Claims Commissioner Eastern Cape
Court
Land Claims Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 September 2016
Case Number
LCC 23/2007
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
YS Meer, H Barnes, R Mqeke
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Interlocutory Application, Costs Award, Community Land Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mazizini Community

Applicant

Prudhoe Community

Respondent

Tharfield Community

Respondent

Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

Respondent

Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Limited

Respondent

Sun International (Ciskei) Limited

Respondent

Regional Land Claims Commissioner Eastern Cape

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the dismissal of an interlocutory application regarding the validity of a land claim.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal would lead to a just and prompt resolution of the real issues between the parties.
  3. 3 Whether there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the interlocutory application did not dispose of all the issues in the case and that an appeal would not resolve the real disputes concerning the validity of the land claims. The court was not persuaded that another court would reach a different decision, and therefore held that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the applicant due to the vexatious nature of the application.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.