Mbaleki and Another v S (2853/2011) [2011] ZAKZDHC 68; 2013 (1) SACR 165 (KZD) (1 April 2011)

Mbaleki and Another v S (2853/2011) [2011] ZAKZDHC 68; 2013 (1) SACR 165 (KZD) (1 April 2011)

The court found that the magistrate had properly considered the burden placed on the appellants to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying bail in terms of section 60(11)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The magistrate weighed the interests of justice against the appellants' right to personal freedom and considered all relevant factors, including the evidence of the investigating officer and the nature of the offences. The appellants failed to adduce viva voce evidence or sufficiently corroborate their alibi, and the probative value of their statements did not discharge the onus required. The court held that the presumption of innocence is not applicable at the bail stage, as it...

Citation
[2011] ZAKZDHC 68
Parties
Appellant: David Mbaleki; Appellant: Africa Mgqambi; Respondent: The State
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 April 2011
Case Number
2853/2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Judges
Steyn
Legal Topics
Bail Application, Exceptional Circumstances, Presumption of Innocence, Onus of Proof, Murder, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Bail Application Exceptional Circumstances Presumption of Innocence Onus of Proof Murder Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Mbaleki

Appellant

Africa Mgqambi

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the magistrate erred in refusing bail to the appellants.
  2. 2 Whether the appellants discharged the onus of proving exceptional circumstances under section 60(11)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
  3. 3 Whether the presumption of innocence applies at the bail stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the magistrate had properly considered the burden placed on the appellants to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying bail in terms of section 60(11)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The magistrate weighed the interests of justice against the appellants' right to personal freedom and considered all relevant factors, including the evidence of the investigating officer and the nature of the offences. The appellants failed to adduce viva voce evidence or sufficiently corroborate their alibi, and the probative value of their statements did not discharge the onus required. The court held that the presumption of innocence is not applicable at the bail stage, as it...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal against the refusal of bail is dismissed.