Mbanjwa v Minister of the National Department of Public Works and Others (JS 776/18) [2021] ZALCJHB 141 (8 June 2021)

Mbanjwa v Minister of the National Department of Public Works and Others (JS 776/18) [2021] ZALCJHB 141 (8 June 2021)

The court considered the grounds advanced for leave to appeal and determined that the application does not meet the threshold of reasonable prospects of success. The judge found no compelling reason to grant leave to appeal, as the applicant failed to demonstrate that another court would likely reach a different...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] ZALCJHB 141
Parties
Applicant: Phindile Mbanjwa; Respondent: Minister of the National Department of Public Works; Respondent: Premier: Gauteng Province; Respondent: MEC for Gauteng Economic Development
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
JS 776/18
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused.
Judges
G. N. Moshoana
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Prospects of Success

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phindile Mbanjwa

Applicant

Minister of the National Department of Public Works

Respondent

Premier: Gauteng Province

Respondent

MEC for Gauteng Economic Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal has reasonable prospects of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered the grounds advanced for leave to appeal and determined that the application does not meet the threshold of reasonable prospects of success. The judge found no compelling reason to grant leave to appeal, as the applicant failed to demonstrate that another court would likely reach a different conclusion based on the facts or law. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is refused.
  • There is no order as to costs.