Mbatha v Motsoeneng and Others (JR701/20) [2024] ZALCJHB 110 (5 March 2024)
The applicant failed to comply with the binding provisions of the Practice Manual and the Rules of the Labour Court, specifically items 11.2.2, 11.2.3, and 16, by not filing the required documents and not delivering a condonation application for late filing. Despite undertakings and correspondence, there was no substantive compliance or explanation that justified the delay. As a result, the review application is deemed withdrawn and there is no live matter before the Court. The Labour Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the application. The applicant union's excuses for non-compliance were found to be implausible and insufficient. Consequently, the application was struck off...
- Citation
- [2024] ZALCJHB 110
- Parties
- Applicant: Mthandeni Mbatha; Respondent: Commissioner Mbongeni Motsoeneng; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Pioneer Foods Pty Ltd t/a Sasko Aeroton Bakery
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 March 2024
- Case Number
- JR701/20
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application Struck Off Roll for Lack of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application struck off the roll for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded against the applicant union.
- Judges
- M. T. M. Phehane
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Labour Practice, Review of Arbitration Award, Practice Manual Non Compliance, Condonation Application, Jurisdiction, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mthandeni Mbatha
Applicant
Commissioner Mbongeni Motsoeneng
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Pioneer Foods Pty Ltd t/a Sasko Aeroton Bakery
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application Struck Off Roll for Lack of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the review application is properly before the Labour Court in light of non-compliance with the Practice Manual and Rules.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to condonation for late filing of the record and related documents.
- 3 Whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the review application in the absence of condonation.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to comply with the binding provisions of the Practice Manual and the Rules of the Labour Court, specifically items 11.2.2, 11.2.3, and 16, by not filing the required documents and not delivering a condonation application for late filing. Despite undertakings and correspondence, there was no substantive compliance or explanation that justified the delay. As a result, the review application is deemed withdrawn and there is no live matter before the Court. The Labour Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the application. The applicant union's excuses for non-compliance were found to be implausible and insufficient. Consequently, the application was struck off...
Court Disposition
Application struck off the roll for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded against the applicant union.
Orders
- The application is struck off the roll for lack of jurisdiction.
- The applicant union, Inqubelaphambili Trade Union, is ordered to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment