McCarthy v Sundowns Football Club and Others (J4373/02) [2002] ZALC 181; (2003) 24 ILJ 197 (LC); [2003] 2 BLLR 193 (LC) (30 October 2002)
The court found that the applicant's fixed term contract with Sundowns Football Club expired on 30 September 2002 and no new written contract was concluded. The purported oral agreement for renewal was not binding under NSL regulations, which require written and signed contracts for professional registration. As the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] ZALC 181
- Parties
- Applicant: Fabian McCarthy; Respondent: Sundowns Football Club; Respondent: NSL; Respondent: SAFA
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2002
- Case Number
- J4373/02
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / First Instance
- Outcome
- Application granted; applicant declared a free agent and entitled to a clearance certificate.
- Judges
- Waglay
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Term Contracts, Free Agency, Clearance Certificates, Internal Remedies, Urgent Interdict
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fabian McCarthy
Applicant
Sundowns Football Club
Respondent
NSL
Respondent
SAFA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding contract existed between the applicant and Sundowns Football Club after the expiry of the fixed term contract.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a clearance certificate as a free agent under NSL regulations.
- 3 Whether the matter was urgent and properly before the Labour Court despite internal NSL dispute resolution mechanisms.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's fixed term contract with Sundowns Football Club expired on 30 September 2002 and no new written contract was concluded. The purported oral agreement for renewal was not binding under NSL regulations, which require written and signed contracts for professional registration. As the applicant was over 23 years old and out of contract, he was a free agent entitled to a clearance certificate. The urgency was justified due to the unique circumstances of professional footballers and the imminent closure of the registration period. The existence of internal NSL remedies did not preclude the court from granting relief, as those mechanisms did not provide for...
Court Disposition
Application granted; applicant declared a free agent and entitled to a clearance certificate.
Orders
- There is no binding contract as envisaged by the NSL between the applicant and the first respondent.
- Applicant is a free agent and therefore free to join the professional club of his choice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment