M.D and Another v Medihelp Medical Scheme and Another (2022-010668) [2022] ZAGPPHC 640 (26 August 2022)
The court found that MPS II is a prescribed minimum benefit condition under category 901K of Annexure A to the Medical Schemes Act. The evidence established that Elaprase is the only available and effective treatment for MPS II and is prescribed in both private and public sector hospitals, despite the rarity of the condition. The court held that the regulatory requirement to follow prevailing public hospital practice must be interpreted in the context of rare diseases, where patient numbers are low and local protocols may not exist. Affidavits from public hospital doctors confirmed that Elaprase is used in public facilities, and European guidelines are followed as de facto protocols. The...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPPHC 640
- Parties
- Applicant: M.D; Applicant: Rare Diseases of South Africa NPC; Respondent: Medihelp Medical Scheme; Respondent: The Council for Medical Schemes
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2022
- Case Number
- 2022-010668
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Relief (part A) Pending Complaint Determination (part B)
- Outcome
- Interim relief granted; the medical scheme is ordered to authorize and pay for Elaprase treatment for the applicant's child pending the outcome of the complaint to the Council for Medical Schemes.
- Judges
- Millar
- Legal Topics
- Prescribed Minimum Benefits, Medical Schemes Act, Interim Relief, Child Best Interests, Rare Disease Treatment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M.D
Applicant
Rare Diseases of South Africa NPC
Applicant
Medihelp Medical Scheme
Respondent
The Council for Medical Schemes
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Relief (part A) Pending Complaint Determination (part B)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Hunters Syndrome MPS II qualifies as a Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) condition under the Medical Schemes Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interim relief compelling the medical scheme to pay for Elaprase treatment pending the outcome of a complaint to the Council for Medical Schemes.
- 3 Whether Elaprase is the prevailing and predominant public hospital practice for treating MPS II.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that MPS II is a prescribed minimum benefit condition under category 901K of Annexure A to the Medical Schemes Act. The evidence established that Elaprase is the only available and effective treatment for MPS II and is prescribed in both private and public sector hospitals, despite the rarity of the condition. The court held that the regulatory requirement to follow prevailing public hospital practice must be interpreted in the context of rare diseases, where patient numbers are low and local protocols may not exist. Affidavits from public hospital doctors confirmed that Elaprase is used in public facilities, and European guidelines are followed as de facto protocols. The...
Court Disposition
Interim relief granted; the medical scheme is ordered to authorize and pay for Elaprase treatment for the applicant's child pending the outcome of the complaint to the Council for Medical Schemes.
Orders
- Hunters Syndrome MPS II is declared a Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) Condition under category 901K as listed in Annexure A of the Regulations of the Medical Schemes Act, 131 of 1998.
- Pending the resolution of Part B, the First Respondent is ordered to authorize the treatment and care costs of all medical interventions required by Z[....] and prescribed by his treating practitioners for Hunters Syndrome MPS II as PMB level of care, including Elaprase, within 30 days of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment