Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

M.D.P v C.J.D.P (2413/2023) [2023] ZAFSHC 240 (22 June 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that interim relief under Rule 43 is appropriate to regulate the care, contact, and financial support of minor children pending the outcome of the main divorce action. Both parties are awarded full parental responsibilities and rights, with primary care and residency granted to the applicant. The respondent is afforded specific contact rights, including alternate weekends, holidays, birthdays, and reasonable telephonic contact. Maintenance pendente lite is ordered at R3,000 per month per child, and the respondent is required to pay bond instalments and contribute to home school fees. Regarding movables, the court accepted the respondent’s tender and specified which items are to be made available to the applicant. A contribution to legal costs is also ordered. The costs of the application are to be costs in the main action.

Court disposition

Interim relief granted pendente lite; parental responsibilities and rights regulated; maintenance and financial contributions ordered; division of movables specified.

Orders

  • Full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the minor children are awarded to both parties.
  • Primary care and residency of the minor children are awarded to the applicant.
  • Specific contact rights for the respondent as detailed in the order, including alternate weekends, holidays, birthdays, and telephonic contact.
  • Applicant may take the minor children on birthdays and her birthday for at least 3 hours if not coinciding with normal care period.
  • Guardianship of the minor children awarded jointly to both parties.
  • Respondent to pay maintenance pendente lite at R3,000 per month per child, commencing 1 July 2023.
  • Respondent to pay bond instalments for the specified property.
  • Respondent to pay 50% of home school registration and book fees.
  • Respondent to make specified movables available to the applicant, with exclusions and partial delivery as detailed.
  • Respondent to contribute R5,000 towards applicant’s legal costs in R500 monthly instalments, commencing 1 August 2023.
  • Costs of the application to be costs in the main action.

02

Material facts

Parties

M[...] D[...] P[...]

Applicant Counsel: Adv M C Louw

C[...] J[…] D[...] P[...]

Respondent Counsel: Adv G J Steenkamp

Amounts and remedies

  • Monthly Maintenance Per Child: ZAR 3,000
  • Contribution to Legal Costs: ZAR 5,000
  • Monthly Instalment Towards Legal Costs: ZAR 500

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Urgent Application / Rule 43 Application for Interim Relief Pendente Lite

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought interim relief under Rule 43, including primary care and residency of the minor children, contact arrangements, maintenance pendente lite, contribution to legal costs, and delivery of movables listed in Annexure D. The applicant argued that such orders are necessary to ensure the welfare of the children and to provide financial support pending the finalization of the divorce proceedings.
Respondent
The respondent disputed the applicant's entitlement to delivery of all movables, indicating which assets are his and that there are multiples of some items. He tendered certain items and opposed delivery of others. The respondent also addressed the maintenance and contact arrangements, seeking reasonable terms and clarity on his obligations.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 43, Uniform Rules of Court

    Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules of Court provides for interim relief in matrimonial matters, including maintenance, contribution to costs, and custody arrangements pending finalization of divorce.

  2. 02

    Children’s Act, Act 38 of 2005

    Section 18(2)(a)-(c) of the Children’s Act sets out parental responsibilities and rights, including care, contact, and guardianship of minor children.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that interim relief under Rule 43 is appropriate to regulate the care, contact, and financial support of minor children pending the outcome of the main divorce action. Both parties are awarded full parental responsibilities and rights, with primary care and residency granted to the applicant. The respondent is afforded specific contact rights, including alternate weekends, holidays, birthdays, and reasonable telephonic contact. Maintenance pendente lite is ordered at R3,000 per month per child, and the respondent is required to pay bond instalments and contribute to home school fees. Regarding movables, the court accepted the respondent’s tender and specified which items are to be made available to the applicant. A contribution to legal costs is also ordered. The costs of the application are to be costs in the main action.

Obiter and limits

  • The court encouraged the parties to engage and reach agreement on the division of movables, reflecting a preference for negotiated interim arrangements.
  • The judgment was handed down electronically, reflecting modern practice in judicial communication.

Court disposition

Interim relief granted pendente lite; parental responsibilities and rights regulated; maintenance and financial contributions ordered; division of movables specified.

  • Full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the minor children are awarded to both parties.
  • Primary care and residency of the minor children are awarded to the applicant.
  • Specific contact rights for the respondent as detailed in the order, including alternate weekends, holidays, birthdays, and telephonic contact.
  • Applicant may take the minor children on birthdays and her birthday for at least 3 hours if not coinciding with normal care period.
  • Guardianship of the minor children awarded jointly to both parties.
  • Respondent to pay maintenance pendente lite at R3,000 per month per child, commencing 1 July 2023.
  • Respondent to pay bond instalments for the specified property.
  • Respondent to pay 50% of home school registration and book fees.
  • Respondent to make specified movables available to the applicant, with exclusions and partial delivery as detailed.
  • Respondent to contribute R5,000 towards applicant’s legal costs in R500 monthly instalments, commencing 1 August 2023.
  • Costs of the application to be costs in the main action.

Source and reliance status

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

Judgment

[2023] ZAFSHC 240

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

IN

THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN

Case no: 2413/2023

Reportable: YES/NO

Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO

Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO

In the matter between:

M[...] D[...] P[...]

Applicant

and

C[...] J[…] D[...] P[...]

Respondent

CORAM: PR CRONJÉ, AJ

HEARD ON: 15 JUNE 2023

DELIVERED ON: 22 JUNE 2023

JUDGMENT BY: P R CRONJé, AJ

This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email, and release to SAFLII. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 12h30 on 22 June 2023.

[1] I heard the matter on 15 June 2023 but as I had other applications to attend to on that date too, and as I sought assistance from the parties as set out below, I reserved judgment.

[2] The Applicant brought a Rule 43 application for relief pendente lite. She inter alia sought an order for delivery of movables contained in an Annexure “D” to her Affidavit.

[3] I enquired from Mr Louw, who appeared for the Applicant, whether such an order could be made if there is no tender by the Respondent. Mr Louw opined that it could be done.

[4] I was not convinced and suggested that the parties engage to see whether an agreement on the movables in the list could be reached. I requested that the parties attempt to revert to me with a list by 10:00 on 20 June 2023, failing which I will issue my judgment.

[5] I received a letter from the Respondent’s attorneys, dated 20 June 2023, only on 21 June 2023. The Respondent indicates therein what assets are his. He also indicated that there are more than one of some items.

[6] I perused the letter and the annexure and my order reflects what I believe to be the tender by the Respondent.

[7] I make the following order.

ORDER

1. The full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the minor children born out of the marriage, as envisaged in Section 18(2)(a) of the Children’s Act, Act 38 of 2005, are awarded to both parties.

2. The primary care and residency of the minor children are awarded to the Applicant.

3. The specific parental rights and responsibilities with regard to contact with the minor children as contemplated in Section 18(2)(b) of the Children’s Act, Act 38 of 2005 are awarded to the Respondent in the following manner:

3.1 the right to take the minor children with him on alternate weekends from 17:00 on a Friday until 17:00 on a Sunday;

3.2 public holidays shall alternate between the parties;

3.3 the right to have the minor children with him for alternative short school holidays, provided that a long school holiday be divided equally on the basis that the minor children will spend an alternative December holiday for Christmas with an alternative party;

3.4 the right to take the minor children with him on the children’s birthdays and his birthday for at least 3 hours if these times do not coincide with a normal contact period;

3.5 the right to take the minor children with him on Father’s Day from 09:00 – 17:00 if this day does not coincide with a normal contact weekend;

3.6 reasonable telephonic contact.

4. The Applicant shall have the right to take the minor children with her on the children’s birthdays and her birthday for at least 3 hours if these times do not coincide with a normal care period.

5. The parental responsibilities and rights with regards to the guardianship of the minor children as contemplated in sections 18(2)(c) and 18(3) of the Children’s Act, Act 38 of 2005 are awarded to the parties jointly.

6. The Respondent shall make payment pendente lite to the Applicant in respect of the minor children at a rate of R3 000.00 per month per child, the first payment to be made on or before 1 July 2023 and thereafter on or before the 1st day of every successive month.

7. The Respondent shall pay the bond instalments of the property known as No. [...] H[...] Avenue, Hospitaalpark, Bloemfontein.

8. Respondent shall pay 50% of the home school registration and book fees.

9. In respect of the items on Annexure “D”, the Respondent shall, pendente lite, make the items available to the Applicant, with the exclusion of items 3, 4, 12, 15, 19, 30, 31, 38, 40, 49, 50, 57, 71, 75, 76, 91, 98, 103, 111, and 125.

10. In respect of items 3, 4, 12, 50, 57, 91, 98 and 103, half shall be made available to the Applicant.

11. In respect of item 19, the Respondent shall make 3 available to the Applicant.

12. The Respondent shall make a contribution towards the Applicant’s legal costs of R5 000.00 in instalments of R500.00 per month, the first payment to be made on or before 1 August 2023 and thereafter on or before the 1st day of every successive month.

13. The costs of this application shall be costs in the main action

P R CRONJé, AJ

On behalf of the Applicant: Adv M C Louw Instructed by: Honey Attorneys

BLOEMFONTEIN On behalf of the First Respondent: Adv. G J Steenkamp Instructed by: Hendre Conradie Attorneys

BLOEMFONTEIN

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Children’s Act, Act 38 of 2005

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Rule 43, Uniform Rules of Court

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.