MEC for Health and Social Development of Gauteng Provincial Government v Mashilo and Another (70808/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 663 (6 October 2017)

MEC for Health and Social Development of Gauteng Provincial Government v Mashilo and Another (70808/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 663 (6 October 2017)

The court found that, after considering all grounds for leave to appeal and the submissions made by both parties, the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The court was not persuaded that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the merits or the costs order....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] ZAGPPHC 663
Parties
Applicant: MEC for Health & Social Development of Gauteng Provincial Government; Respondent: Maseli K Mashilo; Respondent: Dr J Jacobs
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
70808/15
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
AC Basson
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success, Costs Order
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Prospects of Success Costs Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MEC for Health & Social Development of Gauteng Provincial Government

Applicant

Maseli K Mashilo

Respondent

Dr J Jacobs

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the judgment delivered on 14 July 2017.
  2. 2 Whether the order as to costs is susceptible to appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, after considering all grounds for leave to appeal and the submissions made by both parties, the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The court was not persuaded that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the merits or the costs order. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs, including the costs of senior counsel.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs consequent upon the employment of senior counsel.