MEC Limpopo Department of Education v Monkwe Dietrics Services (Pty) Ltd and Others - Leave to Appeal (4663/2021) [2023] ZALMPPHC 53 (20 July 2023)

MEC Limpopo Department of Education v Monkwe Dietrics Services (Pty) Ltd and Others - Leave to Appeal (4663/2021) [2023] ZALMPPHC 53 (20 July 2023)

The court considered the grounds of appeal and the authorities cited by counsel. After careful consideration, the court was not persuaded that the applicant met the required threshold for leave to appeal, namely that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success. The application for leave to appeal was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] ZALMPPHC 53
Parties
Applicant: MEC: Limpopo Department of Education; Respondent: Monkwe Dietrics Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Alijoy Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Nkasi General Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Successful Bidders: Bid №: LDE/B52/2019/20
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
4663/2021
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Orders Delivered on 22 February 2022.
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Mangena
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospect of Success, Costs Award
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Reasonable Prospect of Success Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MEC: Limpopo Department of Education

Applicant

Monkwe Dietrics Services (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Alijoy Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Nkasi General Trading (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Successful Bidders: Bid №: LDE/B52/2019/20

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Orders Delivered on 22 February 2022.

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has met the threshold for leave to appeal.
  2. 2 Whether there is a reasonable prospect of success on appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the application for leave to appeal should be dismissed with costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered the grounds of appeal and the authorities cited by counsel. After careful consideration, the court was not persuaded that the applicant met the required threshold for leave to appeal, namely that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success. The application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.