Medicare Healthcare Group (Pty) Ltd and Others v Dr F Budding & Associates and Others (D1233/19) [2019] ZALCD 11 (7 November 2019)
The court found that the cancellation of the Administration Agreement did not result in the transfer of a business or part thereof as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The applicant merely provided services to the respondent, and its business was not transferred. The equipment was either...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] ZALCD 11
- Parties
- Applicant: Medicare Healthcare Group (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: The Employees Listed In Annexure A; Respondent: Dr F Budding & Associates No. 158 Inc; Respondent: EXP Consulting Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The Employees Listed In Annexure B; Respondent: EXP Healthcare Solutions (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Icebreakers Equipment (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2019
- Case Number
- D1233/19
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment Delivered After Urgent Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs awarded against the first applicant in favour of the first, second, and ninth respondents.
- Judges
- D H Gush
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Transfer, Transfer as Going Concern, Employment Contracts, Costs Award
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Medicare Healthcare Group (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
The Employees Listed In Annexure A
Applicant
Dr F Budding & Associates No. 158 Inc
Respondent
EXP Consulting Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
The Employees Listed In Annexure B
Respondent
EXP Healthcare Solutions (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Icebreakers Equipment (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment Delivered After Urgent Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the Administration Agreement resulted in a transfer of business as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the employment contracts of the affected employees were automatically transferred to the first respondent.
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the cancellation of the Administration Agreement did not result in the transfer of a business or part thereof as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The applicant merely provided services to the respondent, and its business was not transferred. The equipment was either leased and returned or remained the property of the applicant, and the employees were not dedicated solely to the respondent. The facts did not support a section 197 transfer, and the application was dismissed. Costs were awarded against the first applicant in favour of the first, second, and ninth respondents, as there was no reason in law or fairness to depart from the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs awarded against the first applicant in favour of the first, second, and ninth respondents.
Orders
- The first applicant’s application is dismissed.
- The first applicant is ordered to pay the first, second and ninth respondents’ costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment