Meillon v Barnard (37080/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 664 (6 August 2015)

Meillon v Barnard (37080/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 664 (6 August 2015)

The court found that the applicant's case was supported by expert reports confirming the deceased's mental capacity and intention regarding the will. However, the court had already dealt extensively with these arguments in the main judgment and found no basis to conclude that another court would reach a different decision on the facts. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed as there were no reasonable prospects of success.

Citation
[2015] ZAGPPHC 664
Parties
Applicant: Andrew Arthur de Meillon; Respondent: Margaret Catherine Barnard
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
6 August 2015
Case Number
37080/2013
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
C Pretorius
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs Order
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Arthur de Meillon

Applicant

Margaret Catherine Barnard

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the judgment dated 17 June 2015.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has shown reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion on the facts.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's case was supported by expert reports confirming the deceased's mental capacity and intention regarding the will. However, the court had already dealt extensively with these arguments in the main judgment and found no basis to conclude that another court would reach a different decision on the facts. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed as there were no reasonable prospects of success.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
  • The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal.