Melane v Deputy Registrar: Governance & Legal Services of Fort Hare University and (264/2022) [2023] ZAECBHC 19 (8 August 2023)
The court found that the issues at hand related to the applicant's right to education under section 29 of the Constitution and the principle of legality or just administrative action. The founding affidavit relied on sections 29 and 33 of the Constitution, and the interim relief sought was to prevent ongoing infringement of these rights. The matter was therefore properly located in a constitutional setting and qualified as a genuine constitutional challenge. The court considered whether any exceptions to the Biowatch rule applied, such as frivolous or vexatious litigation or improper conduct. It found that the applicant's challenge was not frivolous, vexatious, or brought in bad faith,...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAECBHC 19
- Parties
- Applicant: Yamkela Melane; Respondent: Deputy Registrar: Governance & Legal Services of Fort Hare University; Respondent: Chairperson of the Disciplinary Committee of the University of Fort Hare; Respondent: Chairperson of the Disciplinary Appeals Committee of the University of Fort Hare; Respondent: Vice Chancellor of the University of Fort Hare; Respondent: Dean of Students of the University of Fort Hare; Respondent: Registrar of the University of Fort Hare
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 August 2023
- Case Number
- 264/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Costs Determination Following Interim and Final Relief Orders
- Outcome
- Costs order: Each party to pay its own costs, including in respect of the Part A proceedings.
- Judges
- Govindjee
- Legal Topics
- Right to Education, Biowatch Costs Rule, Disciplinary Proceedings, Interim Relief, Just Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yamkela Melane
Applicant
Deputy Registrar: Governance & Legal Services of Fort Hare University
Respondent
Chairperson of the Disciplinary Committee of the University of Fort Hare
Respondent
Chairperson of the Disciplinary Appeals Committee of the University of Fort Hare
Respondent
Vice Chancellor of the University of Fort Hare
Respondent
Dean of Students of the University of Fort Hare
Respondent
Registrar of the University of Fort Hare
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Costs Determination Following Interim and Final Relief Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Biowatch rule applies to costs in litigation between a university student and the university regarding disciplinary proceedings.
- 2 Whether the applicant's challenge qualifies as a genuine constitutional issue warranting protection from adverse costs.
- 3 Whether any exceptions to the Biowatch rule, such as frivolous or vexatious litigation or improper conduct, justify a departure from the general rule.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the issues at hand related to the applicant's right to education under section 29 of the Constitution and the principle of legality or just administrative action. The founding affidavit relied on sections 29 and 33 of the Constitution, and the interim relief sought was to prevent ongoing infringement of these rights. The matter was therefore properly located in a constitutional setting and qualified as a genuine constitutional challenge. The court considered whether any exceptions to the Biowatch rule applied, such as frivolous or vexatious litigation or improper conduct. It found that the applicant's challenge was not frivolous, vexatious, or brought in bad faith,...
Court Disposition
Costs order: Each party to pay its own costs, including in respect of the Part A proceedings.
Orders
- The implementation of the Disciplinary Appeals Committee’s finding dated 14 March 2022 is suspended pending completion of the applicant’s 2023 academic year.
- Pending the implementation of the DAC’s finding, the applicant is allowed to continue as a student at the University of Fort Hare on the following basis: (a) permitted to continue studies via online learning, off-campus only; (b) may only attend campus with prior written approval of the first respondent, which will...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment