Merchant West (Pty) Ltd v Hellmann and Others (21/27401) [2023] ZAGPJHC 213 (10 March 2023)
The court found that Merchant West could not acquire ownership of the aircraft by constitutum possessorium on the effective date because CDC did not possess or own the aircraft at that time. The agreements specified the dates for transfer, but CDC only acquired ownership on 6 November 2019, after the effective date. Furthermore, the transaction between CDC and MW was found to be simulated, as MW was aware CDC had already paid for the aircraft and the financing was not genuinely for purchase but rather a loan secured by pledge. The court distinguished Boland Bank v Joseph on the facts and followed Kaplan, holding that the requirements for constitutum possessorium were not met. The court...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 213
- Parties
- Applicant: Merchant West (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Denise Hellmann; Respondent: CDC Aviation (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation); Respondent: South African Civil Aviation Authority
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2023
- Case Number
- 21/27401
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment on Ownership Dispute
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- N Manoim
- Legal Topics
- Ownership Transfer, Constitutum Possessorium, Simulated Transaction, Pledge and Security, Leave to Appeal, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Merchant West (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Denise Hellmann
Respondent
CDC Aviation (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation)
Respondent
South African Civil Aviation Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment on Ownership Dispute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ownership of the aircraft passed to Merchant West (MW) by constitutum possessorium prior to delivery to Denise Hellmann.
- 2 Whether the transaction between CDC and MW was a simulated transaction constituting a pledge rather than a genuine sale.
- 3 Whether there is a reasonable prospect of success on appeal warranting leave to appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Merchant West could not acquire ownership of the aircraft by constitutum possessorium on the effective date because CDC did not possess or own the aircraft at that time. The agreements specified the dates for transfer, but CDC only acquired ownership on 6 November 2019, after the effective date. Furthermore, the transaction between CDC and MW was found to be simulated, as MW was aware CDC had already paid for the aircraft and the financing was not genuinely for purchase but rather a loan secured by pledge. The court distinguished Boland Bank v Joseph on the facts and followed Kaplan, holding that the requirements for constitutum possessorium were not met. The court...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- Costs are awarded against the applicant, including costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment