Metro Chicken (Pty) Ltd and Others v Master of the High Court of South Africa, Durban and Others (D14387/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 51 (12 August 2025)
The applicants failed to establish locus standi, as their relationship to the insolvent entity was vague and unsupported by evidence. The founding affidavit did not set out any direct and substantial interest in the liquidation proceedings. Even if standing were assumed, the applicants did not prove any procedural irregularity or misconduct by the liquidators. The sale of assets was conducted in accordance with the Companies Act, with proper valuation and consent from the preferential creditor. The alleged higher offers were not binding and were received after the sale. The Master’s clerical error was explained and corrected. The application for condonation was refused due to a wholly...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAKZDHC 51
- Parties
- Applicant: Metro Chicken (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Hulley and Rice (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Zahir Omar Noor Mahomed; Applicant: Star Super Meats CC; Respondent: The Master of the High Court of South Africa, Durban; Respondent: Kurt Robert Knoop N.O.; Respondent: Brian Lulamile Mbolekwa N.O.; Respondent: Star Meat Market CC (In Liquidation); Respondent: K2021150772 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Deli Co (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sir Fruit (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Artistic Visual (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: USB Packaging (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Coastal Accounting (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ethekwini Municipality; Respondent: Emam Bux (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Lowlands Meats (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: MD Beef (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Exim (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: KLK Lamb (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Freddy Hirsch (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Colver (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Hoxies (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Albany (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Pak Plastics (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Avocet Scales (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Crown National (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: United Bag Sales (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Lupo (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Butchery Equipment and Engineering (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Candy Toys (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Klint Scales (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Everglow (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Garlic Man (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Fathimas Favourite Foods (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Osmans Spices (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Fridge Trans (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Bid Air (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: BBH Agencies (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tradeport (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: ABI Coke (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Cool Perfection (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Hilton Honey Farms (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: TMK Foods (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sana (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Corona Foods (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Midlands Eggs (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mr Stationer (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Minnies Foods (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: PLP Labels CC; Respondent: IFG Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ciro (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Foodroute (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Marhaba Enterprises (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Shan Spice (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Merlog Foods (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vendium (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Grainfed-VKB Group (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Rising Sun (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Star City Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sparo Holdings CC
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2025
- Case Number
- D14387/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs on a punitive scale.
- Judges
- Mossop
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up of Companies, Liquidator Powers, Locus Standi, Sale of Assets, Condonation, Punitive Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Metro Chicken (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Hulley and Rice (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Zahir Omar Noor Mahomed
Applicant
Star Super Meats CC
Applicant
The Master of the High Court of South Africa, Durban
Respondent
Kurt Robert Knoop N.O.
Respondent
Brian Lulamile Mbolekwa N.O.
Respondent
Star Meat Market CC (In Liquidation)
Respondent
K2021150772 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Deli Co (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Sir Fruit (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Artistic Visual (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
USB Packaging (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Coastal Accounting (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Ethekwini Municipality
Respondent
Emam Bux (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Lowlands Meats (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
MD Beef (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Exim (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
KLK Lamb (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Freddy Hirsch (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Colver (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Hoxies (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Albany (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Pak Plastics (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Avocet Scales (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Crown National (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
United Bag Sales (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Lupo (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Butchery Equipment and Engineering (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Candy Toys (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Klint Scales (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Everglow (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Garlic Man (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Fathimas Favourite Foods (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Osmans Spices (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Fridge Trans (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Bid Air (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
BBH Agencies (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Tradeport (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
ABI Coke (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Cool Perfection (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Hilton Honey Farms (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
TMK Foods (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Sana (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Corona Foods (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Midlands Eggs (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Mr Stationer (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Minnies Foods (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
PLP Labels CC
Respondent
IFG Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Ciro (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Foodroute (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Marhaba Enterprises (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Shan Spice (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Merlog Foods (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Vendium (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Grainfed-VKB Group (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Rising Sun (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Star City Investments (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Sparo Holdings CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have locus standi to bring the application.
- 2 Whether the liquidators acted unlawfully or irregularly in selling the assets of the insolvent entity.
- 3 Whether the sale of assets was conducted below market value and to the prejudice of creditors.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to establish locus standi, as their relationship to the insolvent entity was vague and unsupported by evidence. The founding affidavit did not set out any direct and substantial interest in the liquidation proceedings. Even if standing were assumed, the applicants did not prove any procedural irregularity or misconduct by the liquidators. The sale of assets was conducted in accordance with the Companies Act, with proper valuation and consent from the preferential creditor. The alleged higher offers were not binding and were received after the sale. The Master’s clerical error was explained and corrected. The application for condonation was refused due to a wholly...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs on a punitive scale.
Orders
- The applicants’ application for condonation for the late delivery of their replying affidavit is refused with costs, which may be taxed on scale A.
- The main application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment