Meyer and Another v Premier of North West Province and Another (729/10, 732/10) [2015] ZANWHC 21 (2 July 2015)
The court found that none of the plaintiffs or their witnesses could testify to the actual cause of the accident, and all evidence regarding the pothole was speculative. The second plaintiff, as driver, failed to keep a proper lookout and was driving at an excessive speed, which was conceded by his own counsel. Contradictions in witness testimony regarding the location of the pothole further undermined the plaintiffs' case. The court held that there was no prima facie evidence that the pothole caused the accident, nor that the defendants were negligent in a manner that caused the plaintiffs' injuries. The facts pointed to negligence on the part of the second plaintiff rather than the...
- Citation
- [2015] ZANWHC 21
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Chantell Melinda Meyer; Plaintiff: David Zacharias Van As; Defendant: Premier of North West Province; Defendant: MEC for Public Works, Roads & Transport
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 July 2015
- Case Number
- 729/10, 732/10
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Merits Separated From Quantum; Judgment on Merits Only; Application for Absolution From the Instance After Plaintiffs' Case
- Outcome
- Application for absolution from the instance granted with costs against the plaintiffs, jointly and severally.
- Judges
- Kgoele
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Absolution From the Instance, Road Maintenance Liability, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chantell Melinda Meyer
Plaintiff
David Zacharias Van As
Plaintiff
Premier of North West Province
Defendant
MEC for Public Works, Roads & Transport
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits Separated From Quantum; Judgment on Merits Only; Application for Absolution From the Instance After Plaintiffs' Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accident was caused by a pothole on Bethanie road for which the defendants are liable.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs proved on a prima facie basis that the defendants' negligence caused their injuries.
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs' own conduct contributed to the accident.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that none of the plaintiffs or their witnesses could testify to the actual cause of the accident, and all evidence regarding the pothole was speculative. The second plaintiff, as driver, failed to keep a proper lookout and was driving at an excessive speed, which was conceded by his own counsel. Contradictions in witness testimony regarding the location of the pothole further undermined the plaintiffs' case. The court held that there was no prima facie evidence that the pothole caused the accident, nor that the defendants were negligent in a manner that caused the plaintiffs' injuries. The facts pointed to negligence on the part of the second plaintiff rather than the...
Court Disposition
Application for absolution from the instance granted with costs against the plaintiffs, jointly and severally.
Orders
- The application for absolution from the instance by the defendants is granted.
- Costs are awarded against the first and second plaintiffs jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment