Meyer v S (A95/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 142 (10 August 2012)

Meyer v S (A95/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 142 (10 August 2012)

The court considered all points raised by both parties and found that no new grounds were presented that had not already been dealt with in the previous judgment. The court concluded that there are no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the appellant's conviction, particularly on the issue of intent. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was refused.

Citation
[2012] ZAFSHC 142
Parties
Appellant: Esaias Engelbertus Meyer; Respondent: The State
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 August 2012
Case Number
A95/2011
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Conviction and Sentence in the Regional Court
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal is refused.
Judges
S.P.B. Hancke, A. Kruger
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Lack of Intent, Conviction Review
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Lack of Intent Conviction Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esaias Engelbertus Meyer

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Conviction and Sentence in the Regional Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the appellant's conviction.
  2. 2 Whether the element of intent was sufficiently proven against the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered all points raised by both parties and found that no new grounds were presented that had not already been dealt with in the previous judgment. The court concluded that there are no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the appellant's conviction, particularly on the issue of intent. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal is refused.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is refused.