MGRO Properties (Pty) Ltd and Another v Snyers and Another (LCC 05/2013) [2014] ZALCC 12; [2014] 4 All SA 204 (GJ) (17 April 2014)
The court found that the first respondent voluntarily resigned from employment, which lawfully terminated his right of residence under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act and the housing agreement. The notices to vacate served on the respondents were valid, as the dispute regarding termination was not properly before the CCMA due to late referral and lack of condonation. The second respondent's right of residence was dependent on the first respondent and terminated with his resignation. The applicants made reasonable efforts to secure alternative accommodation, and the respondents have enjoyed rent-free occupation for over three years. The requirements for eviction under Section 9(2)...
- Citation
- [2014] ZALCC 12
- Parties
- Applicant: MGRO Properties (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Mouton Citrus (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Abraham Snyers; Respondent: Katrina Snyers
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2014
- Case Number
- LCC 05/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Eviction Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Eviction granted; respondents and all persons occupying through them must vacate the premises by 17 June 2014.
- Judges
- Y S Meer
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Eviction of Occupiers, Termination of Right of Residence, Validity of Notices, Alternative Accommodation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MGRO Properties (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Mouton Citrus (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Abraham Snyers
Respondent
Katrina Snyers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Eviction Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' right of residence on the farm was lawfully terminated under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act.
- 2 Whether the notices to vacate served on the respondents complied with statutory requirements.
- 3 Whether the respondents are entitled to remain on the property as occupiers in their own right.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the first respondent voluntarily resigned from employment, which lawfully terminated his right of residence under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act and the housing agreement. The notices to vacate served on the respondents were valid, as the dispute regarding termination was not properly before the CCMA due to late referral and lack of condonation. The second respondent's right of residence was dependent on the first respondent and terminated with his resignation. The applicants made reasonable efforts to secure alternative accommodation, and the respondents have enjoyed rent-free occupation for over three years. The requirements for eviction under Section 9(2)...
Court Disposition
Eviction granted; respondents and all persons occupying through them must vacate the premises by 17 June 2014.
Orders
- The respondents and all persons occupying through them shall vacate House no. [...] on the farm H[...], C[...], Western Cape, on 17 June 2014.
- If the respondents fail to vacate by 17 June 2014, the Sheriff is authorised to secure their eviction on 18 June 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment