Mhlongo v Sesley Farm Trust and Another (LCC 95/2006) [2008] ZALCC 2 (29 February 2008)

Mhlongo v Sesley Farm Trust and Another (LCC 95/2006) [2008] ZALCC 2 (29 February 2008)

The court found that the plaintiff, Simon Mhlongo, satisfied the requirements of a labour tenant under the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act. He resided on Selsely farm for over fifty years, provided labour, and enjoyed rights to crop and graze cattle. His mother also provided labour and had similar rights. Although the plaintiff received a salary, the Act does not require that payment for labour be exclusively in the form of land use rights; the value of the right to occupy and use land may predominate. The first defendant failed to prove that the plaintiff was a farm worker. The court dismissed the counterclaim for eviction, finding no special circumstances justifying eviction while the...

Citation
[2008] ZALCC 2
Parties
Plaintiff: Simon Mhlongo; Defendant: Sesley Farm Trust; Defendant: Director General for Department of Land Affairs
Court
Land Claims Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 February 2008
Case Number
LCC 95/2006
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff declared a labour tenant with labour tenancy rights; first defendant's counterclaim for eviction dismissed; conditional orders imposed regarding cattle and grazing.
Judges
T Ncube
Legal Topics
Labour Tenancy, Land Reform Labour Tenants Act, Eviction, Acquisition of Land Rights, Burial Rights, Grazing Rights
Land and Property Civil Procedure Labour Tenancy Land Reform Labour Tenants Act Eviction Acquisition of Land Rights Burial Rights Grazing Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Mhlongo

Plaintiff

Sesley Farm Trust

Defendant

Director General for Department of Land Affairs

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Declaratory Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff qualifies as a labour tenant under the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff's right to use cropping and grazing land was exercised in consideration for labour provided to the landowner.
  3. 3 Whether the first defendant is entitled to evict the plaintiff from Selsely farm.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff, Simon Mhlongo, satisfied the requirements of a labour tenant under the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act. He resided on Selsely farm for over fifty years, provided labour, and enjoyed rights to crop and graze cattle. His mother also provided labour and had similar rights. Although the plaintiff received a salary, the Act does not require that payment for labour be exclusively in the form of land use rights; the value of the right to occupy and use land may predominate. The first defendant failed to prove that the plaintiff was a farm worker. The court dismissed the counterclaim for eviction, finding no special circumstances justifying eviction while the...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff declared a labour tenant with labour tenancy rights; first defendant's counterclaim for eviction dismissed; conditional orders imposed regarding cattle and grazing.

Orders

  • The plaintiff Simon Mhlongo is declared a labour tenant with labour tenancy rights in Selsely farm.
  • The first defendant's counterclaim for eviction is dismissed.